IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Status update on TE YANG Models I-Ds

Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com> Tue, 09 November 2021 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F8F3A0B08; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:09:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id urHwfOCXrKCd; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC9F3A0B99; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 05:09:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id f9so22397497ioo.11; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 05:09:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date:message-id :references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :mime-version; bh=2wjAGaGzlVHRknQJr3n1hF9LrXDqa/w+hZODVmIhOKo=; b=RmfgvGQJx6Dqd5kXpIuR9xX4jMfHhDsyLFroXUozBwhvVwpdBYS+0A9B2zkS3JaU3Z 4L2bJcs978kTJARpDxBaeP1hp786122nHYoeVuHvKpjvyw3KfV7glnOF9Vn8r1IhrlOQ 7apoSgx8bhCwbQsM2nsksii30F1EeJpEmqlB0U1FlhEFfsfE5qo4SFSHYyufXvwOwVJQ iXWgUzp+U6Upwb7AsSLHLYqJCtrnn2hFyvqau/a+4mwaQwkQuvSKv6hGtho6UvPPBvY1 vNbjUekJtqS39GdqQba9Fl+XD6d9gDa3k+RXMPuhWXdxLUZOdvg/ztpYOvkAWATH5GUl GhoA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index :date:message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language :content-language:mime-version; bh=2wjAGaGzlVHRknQJr3n1hF9LrXDqa/w+hZODVmIhOKo=; b=ZCyU7loOM3iG8CgiasqKu0zBhRnQveGhjpcL0aAs9Z0LR59D9uEQa9Kai0qJaoc/l9 TgcXvV0/RX5+Uqqh06i+vCkGDv6DuXKGz+aRI9VTMgmiU7Jo0yshx5UbAVD8Vw83gd7x EB7mLXe3emBjeLlUQcSY7uo7BiTNeEA9LFLX8CFUW3RQL2MM1eoFxtajR59uyQEfKud0 HtUdOivBS71RJ/6LEmYA2l1jbHZiouOs1GmdmaoiXBKqJotenY3J3Q1gkQ4dJILb6Bml IAPzw7LA8YrAEuk1hEoKMhFPwmABgHWmGYZxhw1GPFJuu2OcSjET1eonvGqAOKgzzBQX afMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532R8I7Nfz9Ap7L5B5AmAxlvvnpCgVG+Pry2sIM7Cm1A1tjqpD80 tIPr0CweiFR2cvF9LmOTLDk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwdZinIuXa67IUKnGvJfYdftYuiC2MCKKaB77LiIQP2w47M9jSW410yOe1h7ytarh2yaz1vGA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:928c:: with SMTP id s12mr4888062iom.163.1636463353762; Tue, 09 Nov 2021 05:09:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com ([2603:1036:4:9e::5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm10069698ioo.48.2021.11.09.05.09.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Nov 2021 05:09:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-teas-yang-te@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Status update on TE YANG Models I-Ds
Thread-Index: AQHX0/ia+U4Ay2NQv02CxQEIgmosWKv6BdgAgAEmzBo=
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:09:11 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR1901MB215020CC1D4706E335FCE922FC929@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM5PR1901MB2150CA01D46D923B250361C5FC909@DM5PR1901MB2150.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <2fba31d3-6ce9-c565-d2d9-7e9bfa3ee214@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <2fba31d3-6ce9-c565-d2d9-7e9bfa3ee214@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RecordReviewCfmType: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR1901MB215020CC1D4706E335FCE922FC929DM5PR1901MB2150_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/sIgxo04QKTJ21cToNcdJOTmisyE>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on TE YANG Models I-Ds
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 13:09:21 -0000

Hi Lou,

 >> Next Steps:
·         WGLC requested
·         Address received comments

 >> So I read this as an update is needed to address Tom's comments before starting WGLC. Is this correct?
[TS]: we still owe an update to address Tom’s recent comments. We are planning to do within the coming week. We will send a note to the WG and Chairs to alert of this being addressed. We expect WGLC to progress right after.

Regards,
Tarek (for the co-authors)



From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Monday, November 8, 2021 at 2:29 PM
To: Tarek Saad <tsaad.net@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te@ietf.org <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp@ietf.org <draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on TE YANG Models I-Ds

Hi Tarek

thanks for the update:

WRT
On 11/7/2021 12:11 PM, Tarek Saad wrote:
2. draft-ietf-teas-yang-rsvp-16
Current Status:

  *   Version -16
Open Issues:

  *   Received late comments from Tom Petch – working on addressing them
 Next Steps:

  *   WGLC requested
  *   Address received comments

So I read this as an update is needed to address Tom's comments before starting WGLC. Is this correct?

Thanks,

Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email