[Teas] Status update : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 24 February 2021 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4943A1826 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:20:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sT2l3DTnLNCX for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:20:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE09A3A180D for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 07:19:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11OFJ1tB031712 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:19:02 GMT
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68992203D for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:19:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B896722040 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:19:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([87.112.199.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 11OFJ04V002730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:19:01 GMT
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <teas@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:19:00 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <04fd01d70ac0$61629c10$2427d430$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdcKv9McB5pQvNrKT/qe4A85njjHWg==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.112.199.121
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25942.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--3.099-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--3.099-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25942.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--3.099400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HQtbll+gJ6/xIbpQ8BhdbFIC5CRjcVRqsXPI9D4Uri6GcPw7dOPCZoVg +E7Q3H80d11oPSUYj9e3TAdEarbcIDWs2YGWPbxramOGWbsSIFeDwntrnEWhGTTMRkuw8aulgQz BD1jDLJ/e4hOnnc7ROuOnSiyVDiqDIToEhetuNZ1TewUuJwIWFbzETYfYS4xZGUs9b7xvtJpVds 3zwgq4tGJXps4He9zjaGTGpOm8PZQaHwuO1LgVELlRS/TbY0kCyHdfpwipSH6bKItl61J/ycnjL TA/UDoAY/XFS+uWHLUb3MWYExvnbmrz/G/ZSbVq+gtHj7OwNO19R4Ss0oUmJ2KdbC3kjb2vQOMC +Wl7MfdyEOnYKCl0ukl5GKgHLpBbPkY5JBOSukHCSd/6OLUkMeUDiWtJ+iXHl9QE9UJl5ens5rC 1uEWgr7nrea/QXYb3dOnI8WPGJZtXLGtABlf0m8L8HbphQDv4
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/tBofkfrhaAvNygrBE1rzeNJ9AeQ>
Subject: [Teas] Status update : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:20:13 -0000

Hi,  

Here's a quick status update.

We made some great progress immediately after IETF-109 with five revisions
in November and December.

The current version has only one empty section (5.5.1 "Intent-Based
Networking"). Jeff T said he would supply this, but I'm getting silence from
him, so I may go shopping for another author.

At that point, I think I have done everything I can do as editor until I get
some reviews.

So, a plea for reviewers. The chairs may need to help with this.

Thanks,
Adrian