[Teas] Re: [RTG-DIR]RtgDir Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07
Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 August 2024 12:28 UTC
Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F319BC14F6A0; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id il0rq8SRPic6; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11412C14F5F4; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-201ed196debso43832045ad.1; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724156921; x=1724761721; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Rze4IQhPVRA/aW4XsgrwXrH6usSEfsyQILQRAucKX3A=; b=D71sG6bL4MiV+7WqEZLof16anlCE3HPsW9GdZIlpp38wzXBcwLqBpH5gm+MxtBGlfd OwxSwJISFCKeBvNDVjVUE3Dq5HDBeWySugUWJFQfYZWNKSsxqyTh1NlETyrIaW5Arjxg Z3zBjSBxFVOPiVPV1LHxhzNw/4ilS2OgE7rnPeqAsbKLOoERZ9p2rdPkZU5ZsUXDvdOk SXkHtgcghraSm9ZCF9E1nN+fsPZgOeJrPtsEJrTcna8vswLj0hS0cZ31jtOaEM6GNgNn 8hbPGGWoGvfHT8UBaYfRzOcgHxwlkjA0qHu3G+3oc/Rc7DAh+b22VZQhTQgPL4qODa56 OSaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724156921; x=1724761721; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Rze4IQhPVRA/aW4XsgrwXrH6usSEfsyQILQRAucKX3A=; b=UjA86hqTLJ9To85twKnCPnwpj/wy/vGx0FAhh6y5Yl77otpJOnp3ctVO1Tcv+XH5No UOZ42j2TKoYAYm5a3OEbLrC0P+f+s+DNr1rp13kk8ScMjFZE2lMzvg+rYoPseEdJybnR MTqD+N1FC/SNICKxhkxJhUorZWbBZdDF4+JKP8Ahd9FQFjrrJ72wWc+CmB65VgkOIQFv 9Jd5d9JIGDCt/bXYGa2D1BkdoyIzsk2vJRrRIc6mdYEUxv/aZXvyAciJfzUbmjVCkChE jvnpc9lf8Np+Sw3idywNbobvZgOFbUA0RJQc8vwnch8Jv2SHAh+3Bt2UhYu6RaprbmaA 3sfQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCV3G771tY9goM7wplW4CWPrcU2ThfwDJ6yM5GGb4vx6WhWmZzzSeon60zmHefFoE+yzpWue4w==@ietf.org, AJvYcCV7hfbNdtYTbnMlOtpTg/J/v4aNvGhfrA3EDphknKMHpK4/bWvTDAUZS1w02AfgdYearkyzyYlb@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxBXKp0xNal86I06eiM9pRl51vcZf/rkRUYfJwoEEOZOEIH4nG+ TM0FZi8B6bdT4LVDesDx+x4lM/ZT1U6/KQoORMMY2UgrltU0aSBk7VpcjwUM8+0wgSJQRIFiGRg W8aOvS3/lbSEKKrbNRHzfcavc5GC+rSbW
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEF5hqjPSZyCINBZIriPEB4zxeT05Xctzm18MtFiPACslfHjhhC7N07Tv8wP0SfSYptLfPq+2Lw/+AOOAT/cfI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f60f:b0:1fb:72b4:8775 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20203f27dadmr198629145ad.40.1724156920686; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:28:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:28:39 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1bd301daf2fa$5a326990$0e973cb0$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <CAMMESsza+yxa1OmUJiK9KQ3G=R8SraG4O2q84eq0srvsFcGh=A@mail.gmail.com> <1bd301daf2fa$5a326990$0e973cb0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:28:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsyPWWs42LPiggbozAXPGDoFu0nPvMJ65+AH9cZTYFognA@mail.gmail.com>
To: rtg-ads@ietf.org, daniel@olddog.co.uk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cb702e06201c9075"
Message-ID-Hash: JBU7W2O4XBSINRP3N76LV2HKSZMRVRGO
X-Message-ID-Hash: JBU7W2O4XBSINRP3N76LV2HKSZMRVRGO
X-MailFrom: aretana.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing.all@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, rtg-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] Re: [RTG-DIR]RtgDir Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/u2ygf5GguSrtW3RG6W--bidq5mo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>
Thanks Dan — looks good to me! Alvaro. On August 20, 2024 at 8:13:24 AM, daniel@olddog.co.uk (daniel@olddog.co.uk) wrote: Hi Alvaro, Thank you for the review and comments. The latest version of the I-D has addressed the security section comments you made and also included the additional references, and we cleaned up the documents reference usage (normative and informative). Latest version: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing/ Diff from the previous version: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-08 BR, Dan (on behalf of the authors). -----Original Message----- From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Sent: 12 August 2024 21:52 To: rtg-ads@ietf.org Cc: rtg-dir@ietf.org; draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing.all@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org Subject: [RTG-DIR]RtgDir Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07 Hi! I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/rtg/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07 Reviewer: Alvaro Retana Review Date: August 12, 2024. Intended Status: Informational Summary: This document is basically ready for publication but I have some concerns that I think should be resolved before publication. Comments: The document is well structured and easy to read. I have two concerns: (1) Security Considerations The text in section 6 is good. For completeness, it would benefit from a pointer to the Security Considerations in rfc8453 and rfc9543, as well as the Privacy Considerations in that last document. (2) References Based on the definitions from the IESG Statement on Normative and Informative References [1], I believe some of the Informative references should be Normative because they refer to "documents that must be read to understand or implement the technology" in this document. The terminology from I-D.ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn is used. Unless the text in §4 is used as an example of the applicability (but that was not mentioned), the drafts/RFCs mentioned there as specifics on how the ACTN framework is applied to network slicing should be Normative: I-D.ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics, I-D.ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang, I-D.ietf-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang, I-D.ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang, I-D.ietf-teas-yang-te, RFC8299, and RFC8466. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-iesg-statement-normative-and-informative-references Alvaro.
- [Teas] RtgDir Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas… Alvaro Retana
- [Teas] Re: RtgDir Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel
- [Teas] Re: RtgDir Last Call review of draft-ietf-… Alvaro Retana
- [Teas] Re: [RTG-DIR]RtgDir Last Call review of dr… daniel
- [Teas] Re: [RTG-DIR]RtgDir Last Call review of dr… Alvaro Retana