Re: [Teas] Questions about the Appendixes to draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis

[Joel Halpern <[e-mail]>]

Personally, I think we can delete both appendices.  While having an 
historic record is important, the earlier RFC contains that for historic 
purposes.  I do not think that it behooves the community to try to bring 
those two sections up to date, which is what would seem to be required 
if we want to keep them in the document.


Yours,

Joel

On 7/7/2022 6:53 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have just one thing remaining after working group last call…
>
> Don raised some concerns about the Appendixes to this draft and this 
> is an attempt to focus the questions and possibly drive answers.
>
> Appendix A.  Historic Overview
>
>   * Should we delete or retain this Appendix?
>   * If we retain it, should we include some text indicating that it is
>     a subjective view? (If so, what text?)
>   * If we retain it, should we regard it as "History before what is in
>     the body of the text" or should we try to make the history
>     continue towards the present by including pointers back into the
>     body text? (If so, someone is going to need to do that work!)
>   * If we retain it, should we look to fill any gaps between the end
>     of the history documented in the Appendix and the start of the
>     material in the body text?
>
> Appendix B.  Overview of Traffic Engineering Related Work in Other SDOs
>
>   * Should we delete or retain this Appendix?
>   * If we retain it, should it attempt to list out other (all?) SDOs
>     that have done TE work? (If so, who will try to compile this list?)
>
> I would really appreciate any thoughts on these points and, depending 
> on your answers, some (promises of) text.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas