[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-05

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Wed, 17 February 2021 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6793A19AC; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:35:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.004
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_10_20=0.093, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdCQUysLi4ju; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 586523A19AA; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id e133so13589102iof.8; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:35:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l9ICkRrClsA+k/nofGFcR36SKuKxd50jCtQSGO6wiWo=; b=b6VZvZf6inv0eNiPGuqT/jWypmCtC505HZZcU58OQZSw/r4A90TsglkLTPiLfwKS8i zfFqPYmw07ATQjHF+p5UHqhpcEwvtymYXkKZLTF3GCwDoihjVRceUwyCd18RA45QnLg9 yf8pCA9LgsvSjicxBYSduR/edDd6vHhK5dMMpyypz6TV+Fe6fp78z4pLwr9NacWsNBg/ gB/7Yo2mSOOawDrEZ0UXLJ5SlDYv/G0GhQOMTMr+pmJRyV5djyg53V54H6T+Dx/nQFYn cuZHWKNcL/ai6122agT1j9AIN4V4/IrkHzLu09PzmG1330MULRu2MEW842rQxyxQ2cpj nWVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l9ICkRrClsA+k/nofGFcR36SKuKxd50jCtQSGO6wiWo=; b=rkUha7ntPAzKI9VF/ktpgmhIRByJThSkGCi/LpAG4oTvm9+Zcl9dH0Td2E80idLTcq BDQ/JN2u786bsw6MXS4/nwF7xe4hUfWX047Txb5ziOYFdP32gHhrKO28ArSV3/JM5RjY A9ViVvgQaJDetuUVKpVd/rT9WarDkT4nTa9NPKjXbTKoMm9GSWvotCHDyWSFAp7Ea/so QyQMXEvvabpoZbv1YLyG6WloHIS2f0Sn3k4rL7sFJLykny47mTv3zJDarml8IUYMdgGl TR/bG+34qEB1M7MohWHchiVsJb/oAKT/DF0WdLiPdSYjSJK7reYadc8TFYMHClwaj2WE wQ6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532zFEdSfIBTEQfmOTUTEDGTROexqihTRyI83/NZE2FJLeryKfM7 SsnR2an7WEMoYTt4w3zHJE4UCdlDScbV+tr82xc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweZzdzhOsDBbfr91r4j8n0vq4OVVXrEcZT/NN6fxeOMy+s8Fd6vk7J7nou4e+8XTo3dzucmNCDSTUlkVklr+o=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:c6d1:: with SMTP id r17mr4104228jan.72.1613565337480; Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:35:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 06:35:26 -0600
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTv0_P4V51GgJoKtRH-D=PAr0nX7LQifPTyHvb8skStKig@mail.gmail.com>
To: hejia@huawei.com, Italo Busi <italo.busi@huawei.com>, ryoo@etri.re.kr, byyun@etri.re.kr, peter.park@kt.com, tochio@fujitsu.com
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c330a205bb87747c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/xlUivOQ7W6UwjOqlOvZwF1onqH4>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-05
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 12:35:40 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG last call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

ps: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your