Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

"Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com> Thu, 10 January 2019 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <hejia@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCFD131199; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:43:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B8jfaDamOwmB; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63AA41274D0; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A4BB586AFB7DCA77E955; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:43:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.51) by LHREML712-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:43:49 +0000
Received: from lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.51) by lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:43:48 +0000
Received: from DGGEMA424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.157) by lhreml702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:43:48 +0000
Received: from DGGEMA523-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.90]) by dggema424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.157]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:43:39 +0800
From: "Hejia (Jia)" <hejia@huawei.com>
To: "Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com>, "Daniele Ceccarelli" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp
Thread-Index: AdSosGKy4wtotqOhQR2QZqScNtwnVA==
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:43:40 +0000
Message-ID: <735916399E11684EAF4EB4FB376B71955C27357A@dggema523-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.57.113.38]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_735916399E11684EAF4EB4FB376B71955C27357Adggema523mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/xxHBEtJ52vMCQnd7CezMcVnmbhA>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 09:43:54 -0000

Hi Dieter,

When I say “there are implementations in the industry”, I didn’t mean existence of a standard ensures there are implementations but rather “implementation” itself.

B.R.
Jia

发件人: Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) [mailto:dieter.beller@nokia.com]
发送时间: 2019年1月9日 22:47
收件人: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>;; Hejia (Jia) <hejia@huawei.com>;; Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>;; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>;
抄送: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>;
主题: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

Hi Daniele, Jia, all,

the existence of an ITU-T standard (I was aware of that) does not mean that there are implementations. ITU-T defined many different protection schemes and some were
implemented and are supported by many equipment vendors (like 1+1 SNCP) while other protection schemes do not have the same support (those with extra traffic for example).
Re SMP, I have doubts and therefore I decided to vote no/do not support.


Thanks,
Dieter

On 09.01.2019 09:27, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
Hi,

I agree with Jia and support the adoption of the draft. SMP is a standard, I don’t see any reason why we shouldn’t support it’s signaling.

BR

Daniele

From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org><mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Hejia (Jia)
Sent: den 9 januari 2019 03:39
To: Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) <dieter.beller@nokia.com><mailto:dieter.beller@nokia.com>; Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com><mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org><mailto:teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org><mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

Hi Dieter,

SMP standard is published as G.808.3 by ITU-T SG15. As far as I know, there are implementations in the industry. Besides, the draft is not to addess interoperability issue, but rather to define a new protection type that is used in the provisioning of primary and secondary LSPs in the SMP case.

B.R.
Jia
发件人:Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE/Stuttgart) <dieter.beller@nokia.com<mailto:dieter.beller@nokia.com>>
收件人:Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>>;TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>>
抄 送:TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>
时间:2019-01-08 17:46:54
主 题:Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp

Hi Pavan, Lou, all,

Happy New Year!

Here's my reply to the poll: no/do not support

I have doubts whether interoperable SMP implementations are existing today in the data plane that justify the definition of GMPLS signaling extensions to support SMP.


Thanks,
Dieter


On 18.12.2018 15:07, Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote:
All,

This is start of a *three* week poll on making
draft-he-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp a TEAS working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends Jan 8th 2019 (extra week to account for the holidays).

Thanks,
Pavan and Lou




_______________________________________________

Teas mailing list

Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas