IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo

tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com> Fri, 01 May 2020 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfa@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C5A3A0ECC for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2020 03:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.82, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kVr5CYU43R3y for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 May 2020 03:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR05-VI1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-vi1eur05on2107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.21.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ECA33A0ECB for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 May 2020 03:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=eFowdEt17svnqHCJmCZ9A+NhM3PUVql6ZE4Yd6lTQCrDbAiID9vrlmvqgTM5LSF48wWA8Em8o+DLE9GWI0NhsU1xdQ4ytsc+vZAZUHJBLQUPNe2OeXOFf0trSAQZCt3pRM5fPiNR/5VIVzhvRF6S0x2EzMxYtACkGSpC0ZRzRbMhbgXfrMqh7fROKsDdjJ1FD0LcSlaEVMghkCzSHuaFcM7V8YgYBZqEgF2yixaG+rX3qY2gJBUcLK+nzt00ftRLLiVxZCfND95je9BQ5vItzANGw6jJpXVtYgz2iEOS3btBV9QMsA+s7xnQkfs1Fch5KC04EaLtzGHR93rHSLyjnw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HdhjbB0W+x3Qm860PsvncoWnaoo9OiyvjYcpHO5OZ00=; b=OmsUeKPqt4Z5fAqKmZh99AlwwoC7i49qIXv0xFcA5mGP3SD8qGWNSEPzNRMePzwQpAVyZpxFSc8yh6dcbMXTUxtIXhzx31vEmCZMDXGZTLSx+zHzLWRp5PrKZkr7GBMz5e/A0qECPLjBFDOP1hD1rE4Dr1/GymRXPer/AadCp+LLIW87cEUN4AT1/NvAwWKiT3e/HlvUEY5Ds5vhCKork8U85lsJH3h65NGlqdlT1UXYuG+iOkWsXusiPaFEZ0pLselnBXa/5zQgpEwK46JnRazkEz8+qtmzhyaCps+D7A31vUElkK5+KLQgmyWJraCboZTDO6fC8j0v0lkS8cbxjg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=btconnect.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=btconnect.com; dkim=pass header.d=btconnect.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-btconnect-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HdhjbB0W+x3Qm860PsvncoWnaoo9OiyvjYcpHO5OZ00=; b=KDgqdhbRCUym/xlBIRd4x/7YjtKn4j0P+0q+A13tDy/+tSfzp5MJaS3E8wGFqfPve7lbYnUTcV26E5j4hOzft0RwciJuNLzwtgKFZmmhhougyJGjpelszW+MG3ebJY3qE8bIgdi4xOyzQSNPDHpcgz6jLhYRn2nV5pBjvN7M528=
Received: from DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:69::25) by DB7PR07MB3932.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:5:8::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2979.16; Fri, 1 May 2020 10:56:40 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d73:b879:b380:bed4]) by DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d73:b879:b380:bed4%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2979.017; Fri, 1 May 2020 10:56:40 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
To: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
Thread-Index: AQHWGBjZqBIQHbOU4kWdbmKNe1eMVKiTGetT
Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 10:56:40 +0000
Message-ID: <DB7PR07MB53406ABD74B3CEE15B5952BDA2AB0@DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAEz6PPQC8NUnTimMVXBXzbd9+FxdeTDV8NXPuLDASBF=1YUR_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEz6PPQC8NUnTimMVXBXzbd9+FxdeTDV8NXPuLDASBF=1YUR_A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-GB
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=btconnect.com;
x-originating-ip: [81.131.229.19]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3cc30466-33c0-4e3f-f17b-08d7edbe540f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB7PR07MB3932:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB7PR07MB3932B294BDCD44994F001AB3A2AB0@DB7PR07MB3932.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0390DB4BDA
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: oMyMmbLLrK56JwAliLxQp5CA7vG4Ca3V8MLoDgRadSD6DL2CqBTzIgJrRvjwalRl+uZcyJuFbTMVc7FWB1eWODno6t4R9phuMXNm5Q2PaI1lGOgjs+punS1W70JBNk4Y7D23vY85xw5k/YiBv7bSaEvO3HBWVTf9fWo/ZlBz/Ru0gymFQEWcOX8tpdo85WoXZvE7CFVe0d/ZTCa8bpFZWHXaBtooxjP2qUeyYVl9auPEIminxEPAmQMvKuAMT1fHcyqv1XD6PKHjD1Qu+jFEM8VIqbUdh7+9FpIpgbaIdSE1IH9Zj9gddiw9+LafgZwphvZ3ttw55oQTIhaLDHAmc52ZE54kCU/K9OEKuTI7oj9rnQUiEBID1Kf4yH2BNybnDafbajmpLjCF3jZ8FpMnwkE2LEGV4BkSB4N2Rq9TKh9vqTy8ItJVTsUCvMWZyLeV
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB7PR07MB5340.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(91956017)(76116006)(186003)(33656002)(71200400001)(66946007)(2906002)(86362001)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(6506007)(52536014)(7696005)(55016002)(26005)(478600001)(8936002)(110136005)(316002)(8676002)(15650500001)(5660300002)(9686003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3cc30466-33c0-4e3f-f17b-08d7edbe540f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 May 2020 10:56:40.5664 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: am8OX8fgcDqe7O8yo86WwJEl+I9CVdCNDVcaLw/BwzQPbleDEuPCpm4ztKHtf/YLrSMA4k8m6x3AoA5qP2gBbA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB3932
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Gvwg3oEg2U-BRdmkdEVKJRLCgJk>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 10:56:46 -0000

From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Sent: 21 April 2020 21:09


Status update on draft-ietf-teas-yang-l3-te-topo

Current Status:

  *  The updated revision -06 was posted on March 8, 2020:
     - Editorial changes.
  *  Corordinated with ietf-eth-te-topology and ietf-te-mpls-tp-topo
     for the augmentation of ietf-te-topology
     - ietf-te-topology does not need to be changed.
  *  Answered YANG doctor's review comments.

Open Issues:

  *   None.

<tp>

I started  to review this and have given up,  I cannot make sense of section 2, which I see as fundamental to understanding the I-D.
 Thus 
The YANG modulues  ietf-l3-te-topology ...
These two modules augment ietf-l3-te topology
No they don't!  This augments 
ietf-l3-unicast-topology
which is quite different and I find this confusion elsewhere in section two. Thus
Relationship  between Layer 3 Topology and TE Topology
Is that Layer 3 TE Topology or ietf-network-topology?  I think that many if not most  references to TE Topology are ambiguous and need clarifying - is the reference to Layer 3 TE Topology to  ietf-network-topology?

Some of the words are quirky and this website is determined not to let me put them into an e-mail but here goes.

modulues
topoology
moducment
Local ink

Tom Petch
Next Steps:


  *  Update the model to sync with the referenced models like draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-types if there are any changes.
  *  Welcome further reviews and suggestions.
  *  Working Group Last Call after completing the above.

Thanks,
- Xufeng

v2.20.0 | Report a Bug | By Email