[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0080A1A8994 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:41:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLxqVC8xRz8e for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D36351A88ED for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:41:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15288; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1456843311; x=1458052911; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=WUHWxk6L/6kiW4djXVw4mMYActUwyRt8jNXlkLTFVuA=; b=llw4zVcmnnl/2YHN1HD0C8+gpyzT8BCWMxuVJ1hLSmn69rm8ZceLKwhH BP1PPY5GbGc7NveQ001GVSn5iHpVk77GEsuag6rP7HqO5smNnXz0vbwQ8 pk9XVk6vLY3D87VehlhupdLbw0vvEYkD6rQLCmD/DNOW3JeQVMzOILqOO 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUAgAfqdVW/5JdJa1egm5MUm0GuiwBDYFmIYVyAhyBKDgUAQEBAQEBAWQnhEEBAQEEIwpHBQwEAgEIEQQBASgDAgICMBQHAQEFAwIEDgUIiAIDEg6wQY8ZAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFYYShDqCOoFLEQE0IIJKgToFlw4BhViIAoFnS4N5iFKOSwEPDwEBQoNkagGHGTQBfQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,523,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="76465258"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Mar 2016 14:41:50 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u21EfoRK010561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:41:50 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:41:49 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 08:41:49 -0600
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
Thread-Index: AQHRWDfeBNOGxjTCpUiD7m+0EwXslZ84qaOAgAY2WuCABKrhYIABWvEAgAAAZwD///pCoA==
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:41:49 +0000
Message-ID: <ac8a3f2374694d2d8fc6b016d114fba2@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <56A76AFF.4070900@labn.net> <3b8e5eb7af4740ae8b563d6264db869f@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <c88a50d48be2468d8963c4ac0fa5248f@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <d771c922fa504ae09f16070b54c6a11e@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <D2FB18B8.12E27%ggrammel@juniper.net> <pk92duttq0cgo9k66ua2str4.1456822926637@com.syntomo.email>
In-Reply-To: <pk92duttq0cgo9k66ua2str4.1456822926637@com.syntomo.email>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.213.30]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ac8a3f2374694d2d8fc6b016d114fba2XCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/y4k9re_AMbctzAG77Cfng1blYS0>
Cc: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:41:54 -0000

Forwarding to the list

From: Diego Caviglia [mailto:diego.caviglia@ericsson.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 4:02 AM
To: ggrammel@juniper.net; Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>; nabil.bitar@verizon.com
Cc: teas-chairs@ietf.org; Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange


Hi all

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
Diego

from my mobile


-------- Original Message --------
From: Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net<mailto:ggrammel@juniper.net>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 10:00 AM
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com<mailto:mhartley@cisco.com>>,nabil.bitar@verizon.com,Diego Caviglia <diego.caviglia@ericsson.com<mailto:diego.caviglia@ericsson.com>>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>,adrian@olddog.co.uk

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft²


Gert


On 2016-29-02 19:19, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com<mailto:mhartley@cisco.com>> wrote:

>Nabil, Diego, Gert,
>
>We're just waiting for you guys on this. Please could you reply to the
>IPR poll on the list?
>
>Cheers
>
>Matt
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> Second reminder :)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> > All,
>> >
>> > A gentle reminder... please respond to this IPR poll on the WG list!
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> > > Authors, Contributors, WG,
>> > >
>> > > As part of the preparation for WG Last Call
>> > >
>> > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>> > >
>> > > Please state either:
>> > >
>> > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> > > or
>> > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>> > >
>> > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> > > (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>> > >
>> > > If yes to the above, please state either:
>> > >
>> > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> > > or
>> > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>> > >
>> > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>> > > appropriate.
>> > >
>> > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
>> > > the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not
>> > > you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to
>> > > the next stage until a response has been received from each author
>> > > and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN
>> > > THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>> > >
>> > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
>> > > listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your
>> > > obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify
>> > > the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution,
>> > > or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion
>> > > related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see
>> > > the RFCs listed above and
>> > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>> > >
>> > > Thank you,
>> > > TEAS WG Chairs
>> > >
>> > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>> > > response.
>> > >
>