Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection

"Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 13:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tsaad@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288BC129459; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:47:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E36Sr0RTwguf; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:46:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C581B129416; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:46:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13644; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1488894385; x=1490103985; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=D5OnM7UlMDxY2g9hQnIRviqPXBVYukmlOkYJEz4XJHg=; b=OkoZ3P3W5DXh9HrAL7U5BEexON0Pvl5Cowv3pdNKfLEP50LrRgASo9p+ M1ykRP0oYkGMoTC7KOrCMBtb2ggbE4ZVsCAZbL/Xk2CQdA+uqGUrptqnB ooly0VD35JbJdR6GceiNlx9dxz7ehmmGOMyWxTM0+pmBoW2WXPeLLYc08 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DbAQB/uL5Y/4ENJK1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm45KmGBCgeDWIoMkUuIDYd+hSyCDSqFeAIaggI/GAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRUBAQEEI1EFEAIBCBEDAQIrAgICHxEdCAIEAQ0FiWcDFQ6vT4ImK4cRDYM2AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYZOggWCaoJRgVURASMQCRiCTi6CMQWbdjoBhnWHF4QqgXtThE+KAopTiGcBDxA4ewhWFT8RAYZCdQGHZIEhgQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,258,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="394604270"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2017 13:46:24 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (xch-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.220.145]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v27DkOc2009174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:46:24 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com (64.101.220.141) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:46:23 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) by XCH-RTP-001.cisco.com ([64.101.220.141]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:46:23 -0500
From: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>, "ningso01@gmail.com" <ningso01@gmail.com>, "hliu@ciena.com" <hliu@ciena.com>, "zhenbin.li@huawei.com" <zhenbin.li@huawei.com>, "yshen@juniper.net" <yshen@juniper.net>, "fengman.xu@verizon.com" <fengman.xu@verizon.com>, "mehmet.toy@verizon.com" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>, "liulei.kddi@gmail.com" <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>, "renwei.li@huawei.com" <renwei.li@huawei.com>, "quintin.zhao@huawei.com" <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, "Boris.Zhang@telus.com" <Boris.Zhang@telus.com>, "mjork@juniper.net" <mjork@juniper.net>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
Thread-Index: AQHSlsFg/GrjzhM100ega3As3TjRRaGJZOkA
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:46:23 +0000
Message-ID: <77FB903E-A8AE-4A53-BCDE-E0D52166083C@cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.222.231]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_77FB903EA8AE4A53BCDEE0D52166083Cciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/yP8qC1ztD4e-8bNckApXxyyPnyA>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:47:02 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Regards,
Tarek

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, March 6, 2017 at 4:34 PM
To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>, "ningso01@gmail.com" <ningso01@gmail.com>, "hliu@ciena.com" <hliu@ciena.com>, "zhenbin.li@huawei.com" <zhenbin.li@huawei.com>, "yshen@juniper.net" <yshen@juniper.net>, Tarek Saad <tsaad@cisco.com>, "fengman.xu@verizon.com" <fengman.xu@verizon.com>, "mehmet.toy@verizon.com" <mehmet.toy@verizon.com>, "liulei.kddi@gmail.com" <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>, "renwei.li@huawei.com" <renwei.li@huawei.com>, "quintin.zhao@huawei.com" <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, "Boris.Zhang@telus.com" <Boris.Zhang@telus.com>, "mjork@juniper.net" <mjork@juniper.net>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.