Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-18

julien.meuric@orange.com Mon, 16 May 2022 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7650C1850E7; Mon, 16 May 2022 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pwbGoK3fXS1l; Mon, 16 May 2022 07:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CAD5C185B35; Mon, 16 May 2022 07:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr02.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr25.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4L225L3F6GzCr9b; Mon, 16 May 2022 16:41:58 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1652712118; bh=ibZg4aMsyPei5IO6+ZfmURLn9QspYfbpUifyO9xkt+E=; h=From:Subject:To:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NC1NgFIH3Edhkw2bDe6J6Uc76qVI1s7Hf8Xp6k0K2RCbYjjF2wt62lYqi685mQh/F CUQ3vp+5BQs6iKovFZEjxWlCfMbqHqsrc0jdhrvYT8PZrQyaCWnF/FWm0iqTTUADwg 1idJkXPe6H3mBX9prJj2kzvgnW/uyeA7Hax/YXyuW2L4hSaaPsdP2AO+v+Z2FF7rrH zjiitQM8dGolFtTTMQz4J/lMKIqn2n+H4Tsf9fThbSk/G2CrrlUks7z0SIIxTF2UbY 8Q7wb2X4g3N/FFuK6THM25wm+ietckaB5C2OnDrzklkSdM7K9F0FFMH9HX+UreH4om dSRdNLcN2MGgw==
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Italo Busi <italo.busi@huawei.com>, "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>, Oscar Gonzalez De Dios <oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>, ansha@google.com, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, victor.lopez@nokia.com, Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>, karthik.sethuraman@necam.com, michael.scharf@gmail.com, "Beller, Dieter (Nokia - DE)" <dieter.beller@nokia.com>, gianmarco.bruno@ericsson.com, francesco.lazzeri@ericsson.com, younglee.tx@gmail.com, Carlo Perocchio <carlo.perocchio@ericsson.com>, Olivier Dugeon <olivier.dugeon@orange.com>
CC: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CA+YzgTsTioj69oA8+6r2Skv2Oa4kAGRpa81UOjqvEUisfUKrRg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Orange
Message-ID: <31cb5b3a-4223-f4be-ed4c-29a79453ee22@orange.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:41:53 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTsTioj69oA8+6r2Skv2Oa4kAGRpa81UOjqvEUisfUKrRg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010703040601040902030907"
X-Originating-IP: [10.115.26.50]
X-ClientProxiedBy: OPE16NORMBX102.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.26.3) To OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.16)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ycb6uvQLk7WztZLDMFBVOw3M40M>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-yang-path-computation-18
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 14:42:05 -0000

Hi all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Cheers,

Julien


On 06/05/2022 19:23, Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor
> please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF ifyou are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrainfrom
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> Pavan and Lou
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.