Re: [Teas] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Thu, 03 October 2019 04:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E54120825; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tV-mMUc70Fb8; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m177134.mail.qiye.163.com (m177134.mail.qiye.163.com [123.58.177.134]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B66A120835; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 21:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [240.0.0.1] (unknown [52.74.226.97]) by m176115.mail.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 8EAA1662028; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:30:13 +0800 (CST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-D4530111-5BFF-4260-AF73-55003C962C9D"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <4747687D-42CB-4132-935B-6F7C8E2868D4@tsinghua.org.cn>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 12:30:09 +0800
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, teas-chairs@ietf.org, lberger@labn.net, teas@ietf.org
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A577)
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUlXWQgYFAkeWUFZTVVJQkhCQkJNTEpCSE1LT1lXWShZQU pMS0tKN1dZLVlBSVdZCQ4XHghZQVk1NCk2OjckKS43PlkG
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6MC46DCo*HTkBP0oLHw8wGEod LyxPFAlVSlVKTkxLS0xMS0pCSUhLVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlOSVVMT1VJSU1VQkxZV1kIAVlBTk1JTjcG
X-HM-Tid: 0a6d8fe1f6549373kuws8eaa1662028
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/yxlT2EhEJpopLZErV5949ltGHQw>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 04:30:25 -0000

Hi, Alissa:
Thanks for your review.
Will you have a look at my responses mail to Eric(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Rhuq8ANBqi5rTUgGaq2XsaH34U4)
And 
Roman(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/IgJH9EZb0I9nx4TyaGEBROEiGos)?

Wish these explanations can convince you the future vote.
We will update the new version of this draft in coming time.

Thanks in advance.

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

>> On Oct 3, 2019, at 08:25, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios-09: Abstain
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-native-ip-scenarios/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I agree with Éric and Alvaro. It's not clear what is gained by publishing this
> as an RFC rather than a research paper, especially given the lack of support in
> the WG.