Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 24 August 2022 16:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320D6C14F718; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEZzS0RCb6Wq; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6763BC14F692; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MCXDG13Vlz6Gd6R; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1661359870; bh=iaGiSsPocCPV8jZtrTQYMiGpREBlO8eRFsauQGz/bVQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=cpx4s0YGTD73G8jvdYTsLJQJGFR+xZOFdmQq9fF3WfC2TMBvASFI9HS8B6xQYzs59 7aD0qnef4NF806/OZa/jmfnmJw6Tr0jSeWo++jL69UXM8/BCtI34mwsRcgc0PFi8Qj ZKk5tnHRzB2QhKsKwLtDjuD6v1Ym+CDHgX2iXy/Q=
X-Quarantine-ID: <UViH7t5P1KOz>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at a2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.23.181] (unknown [50.233.136.230]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MCXDF2cCPz6G8sp; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <e2e196b0-6edf-a7bc-9a16-236b270c9c67@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:51:07 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, teas-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: teas@ietf.org
References: <165956437769.55050.16490105634807702976@ietfa.amsl.com> <0f3d01d8a786$731d5cb0$59581610$@olddog.co.uk> <01dc01d8b7c6$02ee2a00$08ca7e00$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <01dc01d8b7c6$02ee2a00$08ca7e00$@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/zWp_HKXP9XctcnoRrOnle5TqrCE>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Repeated call for last call on draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:51:14 -0000

In discussion with various people, I am finding that there is a lot of 
confusion about meaning of "default NRP", and the related perspective 
that as far as I can tell one can deliver modest numbers of NRPs with 
existing technologies.

I am talking to folks trying to come up with proposed better language.

Yours,

Joel

On 8/24/2022 10:30 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi chairs,
>
> Three weeks on, just wanted to ask what the status is.
> I'm sure you have a queue of documents pending WG last call. It would be
> helpful if you could make that public so that I don't have to keep asking
> you for status.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 03 August 2022 23:15
> To: teas-chairs@ietf.org
> Cc: teas@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.txt
>
> Hi Chairs (and WG),
>
> This version includes the additional appendixes as discussed on the list.
>
> I believe we are done with this document and we should push it through WG
> last call, getting thorough review as we do it. I think that is fairly
> pressing to reach conclusion on this framework so that the other dependent
> documents know that they are building on stable foundations.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of
> internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Sent: 03 August 2022 23:06
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: teas@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
> Signaling WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Framework for IETF Network Slices
>          Authors         : Adrian Farrel
>                            John Drake
>                            Reza Rokui
>                            Shunsuke Homma
>                            Kiran Makhijani
>                            Luis M. Contreras
>                            Jeff Tantsura
>    Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.txt
>    Pages           : 51
>    Date            : 2022-08-03
>
> Abstract:
>     This document describes network slicing in the context of networks
>     built from IETF technologies.  It defines the term "IETF Network
>     Slice" and establishes the general principles of network slicing in
>     the IETF context.
>
>     The document discusses the general framework for requesting and
>     operating IETF Network Slices, the characteristics of an IETF Network
>     Slice, the necessary system components and interfaces, and how
>     abstract requests can be mapped to more specific technologies.  The
>     document also discusses related considerations with monitoring and
>     security.
>
>     This document also provides definitions of related terms to enable
>     consistent usage in other IETF documents that describe or use aspects
>     of IETF Network Slices.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices-14
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas