IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG Adoption Poll - draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04

song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn Tue, 07 September 2021 03:29 UTC

Return-Path: <song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB543A114E; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 20:29:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K_pZhqnLGHw0; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 20:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECC8C3A1048; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 20:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.164.215]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 5D285DE444C34DB3AB4F; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:29:48 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 481B2F562D9D98530F68; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:29:48 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp01.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.200]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 1873TUVm095869; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:29:30 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp05[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:29:30 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 11:29:30 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afd6136dc9a2f3356e7
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202109071129307200855@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvvwy=0Pstp79UNkjKF014Y=b96=uMMaDU35uLTAVj0Aw@mail.gmail.com>
References: CA+YzgTvvwy=0Pstp79UNkjKF014Y=b96=uMMaDU35uLTAVj0Aw@mail.gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: song.xueyan2@zte.com.cn
To: vishnupavan@gmail.com
Cc: teas@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 1873TUVm095869
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/zZhQtezjDX1TcJm29jhWdJqStU0>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Adoption Poll - draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 03:29:57 -0000

Hi all,

"no/do not support".

If there is existing technology (such as ACTN VN, L2SM, L3SM, TE YANG, etc.) can be reused with necessary augmentations for the realization of NSC NBI YANG, we should refer to them but not to specify a new one.

Best regards,
Xueyan


------------------原始邮件------------------
发件人：VishnuPavanBeeram
收件人：TEAS WG;
抄送人：TEAS WG Chairs;
日 期 ：2021年08月27日 23:07
主 题 ：[Teas] WG Adoption Poll - draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04
_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

All,

This is start of a *two* week poll on making
draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04 a TEAS working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".
If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If
yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see
addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends September 10th.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email