IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06: (with COMMENT)

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Fri, 22 December 2017 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB70127275; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:58:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A6z-mWp4QztP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:58:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E32126D73; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:58:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id m25so14225066pgv.12; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:58:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lZXpbLC3QpIqvYzhm/rkFIpJVXT94pNUffIn9TeycNA=; b=sERNgn+EOzT5w5hXEUIZ7INNRREblhfPwZrvTxEQArnWzb6pQZ3eQY4BC5SldQAAKm 1Fo5sQmVxf8LLdcdL1R9zfQmm1xIFTVKjILEM348axQVe6LCjKnATa4AnaKX65miaWJU dCS0pzQJfEabLJqwUFwF+heTYZQbfl6yxcZ+pMdZP8dqPD7X4ZnBVvbnLd9pBSMsJZvk 1MNJInWmv2lhUrwtrnrD5h+1XCXr+egZgQWmK9NIyE/D1LQQ/+ZlP1xtMhgi6ap24OE+ VBS3yom8as4a88V1yRmKwl0vN12ctAmAFZU0EFngNgQAIjLeQEI8Q7vkjjaDAAcbyiZ0 dsFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lZXpbLC3QpIqvYzhm/rkFIpJVXT94pNUffIn9TeycNA=; b=Y4MJ5V3R2HXqMGfq7fUHIzugmQ/KXgSeujs7biKYZBB6eXhh9ihC8NxxEevKL3USHD pnU2Oq6oEOJT/rJFPIgvRw0ck4YI7f0W38rOqfX9EcuGJvCYRM7ubdMYLPd1h3H2JUn/ Y0RI1ADLq/9cUGBIvzoROB9ZsW+DsbfT06WXa0uAAKPRv3r/1Obxg3u11mpEJkFqbDUW eFANV5kfaUnRAzLQFKFn3duv9NFZCRfAGsD8SjTKm0+n7taqYKeKsxjYx+I29vmfz2qg 5Kn5TKJR9lD9+y9/fdCxCmh3eN10HDmVa+KENwcCYbuE3JQDi/jzoBx6aWZ/5KkEaH6T H8Ig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJJTFda/EYSrrEIMkqig35qmP03ORqX8993JNH9kAylIFX7flTH pMUf1cJoTim+FBzqrPBs5BRiOUfxJ20pkRQLOIE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotIiSSwJOnHpmJ6/1JDsy18+1LOjjRsRnG2TvVwb0L7Pdi1M+vLk9y5lQWoOdJNywQt4RaBwxjOaO4eA1suWY4=
X-Received: by 10.99.55.23 with SMTP id e23mr4587958pga.156.1513929494310; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:58:14 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.170.203 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 23:58:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTsegZ46VwCa3UMwkAHwRp2EsdifXnNprD5U3znMhPZYCw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <150634961899.27517.2676098033688714820.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+YzgTuB3XCgw03Vsx8dHH2NeQEeitdJSV0Na_+CZ6QJS4QJpA@mail.gmail.com> <7F5E6E3A-04DA-4960-94C2-7E66F960C426@cisco.com> <CA+YzgTsegZ46VwCa3UMwkAHwRp2EsdifXnNprD5U3znMhPZYCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 02:58:13 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTu4HdB4YP-zStmr2wSKVp963LpdcELPiHhzGTm3MtfJkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: aretana.ietf@gmail.com
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045c56e6b936ab0560e92d51"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/zyuJyDGbWpT8sy5Wc8VyXHenBDg>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 07:58:16 -0000

Fixing Alvaro's email-ID.

-Pavan
ps: Sorry for the spam.

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 2:48 AM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Alvaro, Hi!
>
> Please go through the Gen-Art Review thread. We concluded on that thread
> that this document does not update RFC2961. Please go through the latest
> rev (-08) and let us know if there are any further concerns with
> progressing this document.
>
> Regards,
> -Pavan
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <
> aretana@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Pavan:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the update!
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe a nit, but I think it would be good to explicitly state that the
>> rfc2961 recommendation by themselves won’t do much.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> Alvaro.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/27/17, 11:19 PM, "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> (1) This document seems to do two things: make a series of rfc2961
>> recommendations, and introduce a couple of new techniques.  What is not
>> clear
>> to me is whether the first part is independent of the second.  Will the
>> implementation of Section 2.1. ("RFC2961 Specific" Recommendations)
>> provide
>> scaling benefits on their own (i.e. without the new techniques)?  If so,
>> please
>> add some text (maybe in the Introduction) to indicate that.
>>
>>
>>
>> [VPB] The implementation of the RFC2961 specific recommendations (Section
>> 2 in rev -07) alone will not provide any significant improvement to the
>> existing scaling numbers.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email