[Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Mon, 05 June 2006 16:23 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnHrk-0006pJ-O3; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:23:44 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnHke-0001mz-Iq; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:16:24 -0400
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnHkd-0008R4-65; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:16:24 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.2] (adsl-71-131-66-59.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [71.131.66.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k55GGnOm005329 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 09:16:50 -0700
Message-ID: <448458D2.5010702@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:16:18 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060524115045.06eb0a80@vigilsec.com> <tslhd3fjo12.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <7.0.0.16.2.20060524142029.06ef7e40@vigilsec.com> <tslslmzi83i.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <7.0.0.16.2.20060524144104.05718a70@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20060524144104.05718a70@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc2@dcrocker.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 12:23:43 -0400
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org, techspec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org
Russ Housley wrote: > Sam: > > If the people with copyright interest are the combination of the authors > plus the contributors, then we need to specify this in a BCP. > > Does the RFC Editor have to contact the members of both lists during > Auth48? If so, I would suggest that the RFf Editor only needs a > positive reply from the authors, but that the contributors only need to > respond if they discover a change that is needed. In looking over the various sub-threads on this topic, it is feeling an awful lot like the discussion is trying to attend to legal issues, without benefit of legal counsel. (I know that a number of the participants in the thread have been dealing with this topic, for a long time, including contact with legal counsel. My point is that the current discussion either ought to include direct contribution by an intellectual property attorney or we should largely drop the issue.) Wouldn't it make more sense for the rules concerning author list to be dictated by the combination of the needs to state primary resonsibility, ie, those writing the docs, and logistics/processing needs of those publishing it? d/ _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list Techspec@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Masataka Ohta
- [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Russ Housley
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Russ Housley
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Russ Housley
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Vijay Devarapallli
- [Techspec] RE: RFC Author Count and IPR David Harrington
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Ken Raeburn
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Henning Schulzrinne
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Vijay Devarapallli
- [Techspec] RE: RFC Author Count and IPR Gray, Eric
- [Techspec] RE: RFC Author Count and IPR Gray, Eric
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Andy Bierman
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- [Techspec] Tracking IPR (Re: RFC Author Count and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Harald Alvestrand
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR John Loughney
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR todd glassey
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR bmanning
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR todd glassey
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Bill Fenner
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Dave Crocker
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Jeffrey Hutzelman