Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR

"Lucy E. Lynch" <llynch@darkwing.uoregon.edu> Thu, 25 May 2006 16:19 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjIYH-0006V0-Ab; Thu, 25 May 2006 12:19:09 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjIYG-0006Up-DU; Thu, 25 May 2006 12:19:08 -0400
Received: from mserv4.uoregon.edu ([128.223.142.54] helo=smtp.uoregon.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FjIYF-0006dU-1k; Thu, 25 May 2006 12:19:08 -0400
Received: from geoduck.uoregon.edu (geoduck.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.113]) by smtp.uoregon.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4PGJ1uL023685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 May 2006 09:19:01 -0700
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:19:01 -0700
From: "Lucy E. Lynch" <llynch@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
X-X-Sender: llynch@geoduck.uoregon.edu
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Subject: Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
In-Reply-To: <20060525153544.GC21255@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605250912070.30277@geoduck.uoregon.edu>
References: <200605242059.NAA14811@gra.isi.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605241401130.29244@geoduck.uoregon.edu> <44756EDF.1020408@alvestrand.no> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605250641550.18696@geoduck.uoregon.edu> <20060525153544.GC21255@vacation.karoshi.com.>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1484/Thu May 25 08:19:23 2006 on mserv4
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, techspec@ietf.org, Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>, ipr-wg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org

On Thu, 25 May 2006, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:

> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 06:42:06AM -0700, Lucy E. Lynch wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 May 2006, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
>>
>>> Lucy E. Lynch wrote:
>>>> Let me try re-stating my question. Is there a one-to-one relationship
>>>> between the listed authors on an IETF document and ownership of the
>>>> given document's Intellectual Property?
>>> I can answer that one...
>>>
>>> No.
>>
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Lucy E. Lynch 				Academic User Services
>
> 	not knowing Harolds legal background or current standing w/
> 	the ABA, (or EU equivalent) I think that Bob's recommendation
> 	on getting actual legal advice on your question puts you and
> 	the organziation represented (IETF) on much better grounding
> 	than a simple; "I can answer that... no" on an email list.
>
> 	just my (uninformed) opinion.

Bill -

Understood, as I say, I'm just trying to get a handle the range of 
community opinion(s) and the scope of the problem. This issue
cuts across TechSpec, the IPR WG, the RFC-Editor's office, and
the IETF Trust (as well as individual authors etc.). Everyone sees 
this slightly differently. Before we ask for advise, I'd like to 
understand the problem set.

> --bill
>

-- 
Lucy E. Lynch 				Academic User Services
Computing Center			University of Oregon
llynch  @darkwing.uoregon.edu		(541) 346-1774

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec