[Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 13 July 2006 15:09 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G12oY-0004Lu-Jt; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:09:18 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G12oU-0004Jj-Pf; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:09:14 -0400
Received: from [132.219.31.84] (helo=carter-zimmerman.mit.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G12nv-0008Tp-1o; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:08:40 -0400
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id D323FE0079; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:08:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
References: <44B2497D.3060000@isoc.org> <44B657C4.60102@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:08:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <44B657C4.60102@cisco.com> (Stewart Bryant's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:25:08 +0100")
Message-ID: <tslmzbd4k50.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8ac499381112328dd60aea5b1ff596ea
Cc: IAB <iab@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, techspec@ietf.org, IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: [Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org
I do not support Stewart's comment. However I will note that our current process requires the rfc-editor to accept ASCII input along with non-normative PDF or PostScript input. The SOW should reflect this current practice. _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list Techspec@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
- [Techspec] RFC Editor SOW Review Ray Pelletier
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] RE: RFC Editor SOW Review Stephen Hayes (PL/EUS)
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review Brian E Carpenter
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review Brian E Carpenter
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review Stewart Bryant
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review Stewart Bryant
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Editor SOW Review Stewart Bryant