IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teep] JSON/JOSE vs. CBOR/COSE

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Thu, 20 February 2020 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <emmanuel.baccelli@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70251208A4 for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:51:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.396
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.396 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHd6tr0ovTwC for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774401208A0 for <teep@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:51:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id z9so3225550oth.5 for <teep@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:51:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8qif7LckR51RGilgMoEDQbbzniDIgKV+lPQHTw7e7do=; b=nz0zKEcg31+yVIrADFNth9Hp23s548k3b2lb2HSU0P3/pSezBkJR9TV20t+CkWT+lF +yIEytFRLdiCEwhO6OWgKRVN1xLgU4mLu5ncGYWyOc8znPlPX5r3vej35Bgh03kLMqrq HX9I8FbCbfdoAw2M3LbGPR+SEpnZvztnh76loQFDaq6CUxbPIwxj3qQ6p0bX0M23qcpn E0e1Y35FKekainS4KQeMuiUp8GMFCo6FCQhum1tXE4NkAd/DcNzsarG1z2dpBTAKM8Zb JtVVHNcD72xFZXbDWCJb9OsXaafuIh74YfnfNRrpmjX2WhWonLVlGJpXUX608oDMexpL VOwQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXoXxGZVTyBMCFDi6mTeG9Dxy9Y7IZQGcc1Eb/yjD8j1SXO6fC4 V0qKOIOQITENftW5fwTmZMNq9v6ZhMmxw/C0S89Bgw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzV/BrSiS1c/pXYgo7ndHhzftz3VOm9b5py8K5w4nyGbAc2P3XIAaZs3IIKkt+kWwHUx9ZPbbLR0EoMAeoQg1k=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6b06:: with SMTP id g6mr22970829otp.93.1582195871556; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 02:51:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM6PR08MB37181998F4E68A7F6BCC8110FA130@AM6PR08MB3718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR08MB37181998F4E68A7F6BCC8110FA130@AM6PR08MB3718.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:50:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CANK0pbYeA3tm5CuNrBms4vxYsBOkSNTtHV3BbCXnV3Phoye_jw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "teep@ietf.org" <teep@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e3a66a059effae56"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teep/4_6BidN6iDK3eMAqs5Mzo8DECI8>
Subject: Re: [Teep] JSON/JOSE vs. CBOR/COSE
X-BeenThere: teep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A Protocol for Dynamic Trusted Execution Environment Enablement <teep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teep/>
List-Post: <mailto:teep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:51:19 -0000

Hi Hannes,

On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:16 AM Hannes Tschofenig <
Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:

>
>
> I believe we should only have one encoding.
>

+1

The use of CBOR/COSE will allow us to keep the trusted computing base
> smaller
>

+1 for keeping things small when possible.

Cheers,

Emmanuel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email