IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teep] Working Group Last Call for HTTP Transport for Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning: Agent-to-TAM Communication

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 17:05 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B2D1208D2 for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:05:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkitOqSRL8lr for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:04:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511AD120807 for <teep@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:04:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B69300B1A for <teep@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:38:15 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id AcEz0lQ5n5Wh for <teep@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:38:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [192.168.0.166] (wsip-72-194-193-110.dc.dc.cox.net [72.194.193.110]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1A5B9300AA0 for <teep@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:38:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2538244D-0994-4D24-991B-62111C420C02"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:04:53 -0500
References: <CY4PR1601MB12540E3731269EF636F9D5B1EA180@CY4PR1601MB1254.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
To: "teep@ietf.org" <teep@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR1601MB12540E3731269EF636F9D5B1EA180@CY4PR1601MB1254.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Message-Id: <BF015A00-E295-47FD-98B5-1E7BCF5C0F49@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teep/IPlyB2q9UxKzOmg-jFXXMXD9xtc>
Subject: Re: [Teep] Working Group Last Call for HTTP Transport for Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning: Agent-to-TAM Communication
X-BeenThere: teep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A Protocol for Dynamic Trusted Execution Environment Enablement <teep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teep/>
List-Post: <mailto:teep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:05:00 -0000

I read the document.  It looks really dood, but I have two comments:

1) My reading is that application/teep+json is not required for the content type.  I think it should be.

2) Are there better examples "Foo" or "Bar" in the example.  If not, please explain them in the text.

Russ


> On Feb 11, 2020, at 5:02 AM, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
>  
> This message starts a Work Group Last Call (WGLC) for HTTP Transport for Trusted Execution Environment Provisioning: Agent-to-TAM Communication.  The version to be reviewed is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-04 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teep-otrp-over-http-04>  
>  
> The WGLC will last for 2 weeks and will end on 26th Feb 2020.
>  
> Please send your comments to the list before this date and your assessment of whether or not it is ready to proceed to publication.
>  
> Regards,
> Tiru & Nancy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email