Re: [Teep] [Suit] Value of COSE_Mac_Tagged/COSE_Sign_Tagged/COSE_Mac0_Tagged/COSE_Sign1_Tagged

[Akira Tsukamoto <[e-mail]>]

Hi Henk,

Thanks for you comment.
I now am perfectly clear about the label name is just annotation for array in cddl.

Best,
-Akira

On 4/9/2020 11:13 PM, Henk Birkholz wrote:
> Hello Akira,
> 
> in an array context, the name (aka label) is annotation only. It is not transferred over "the wire", so we did not bother to define a corresponding type.
> 
> In other words, you could simply omit "type: " and "token: " and nothing would change. It is annotation for humans, basically.
> 
> See https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftools.ietf.org%2Fhtml%2Frfc8610%23section-2.1&data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7C85cf47c432354e5fa73a08d7dc903817%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220384303337245&sdata=%2B%2Bm5aUI2zpFdEXec5dNElG4KNhC%2B60TeUDxMcXjtGqo%3D&reserved=0
> 
> Viele Grüße,
> 
> Henk
> 
> On 09.04.20 15:38, Akira Tsukamoto wrote:
>> Hi Carsten and Hannes,
>>
>> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fietf-teep%2Fteep-protocol%2Fpull%2F27&data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7C85cf47c432354e5fa73a08d7dc903817%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220384303337245&sdata=ZDVr31cNQdQNR5H2bcvnC%2Bj7m%2BDgVz1kIe4us99%2B%2BsA%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> The new pull request reflects all the discussion points of converting
>> from map and using minimum major type size for the array member.
>>
>> When I was reading the cddl draft, I was not quite sure how to
>> describe the array with the label name.
>> In your pull request,
>>
>> query-request = [
>>       type: TEEP-TYPE-query-request,
>>       token: uint,
>>
>> The above cddl description has label name type and token with semicolon.
>> We were trying to avoid having label name inside the array.
>> I thought I have to use => for this purpose.
>>
>> Other discussion we had with the teep is to use the same nonce as the
>> EAT defines.
>>
>> nonce => bytes,
>> to be
>> nonce => bstr .size (8..64)
>>
>> And the size of token we never really agreed about it.
>> How bout
>>    token: uint .size 4
>>
>> The 32bit unsign integer seems to be reasonable for the usage in teep.
>>
>> Best,
>> -Akira
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:12 PM Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2020-04-09, at 14:07, Brendan Moran <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  From a SUIT perspective, I’m still inclined to make sure that this is tagged as that allows for use-cases that we may not have considered.
>>>
>>> Makes sense.  Let’s fix the definition of `SUIT-envelope` in the below.
>>>
>>> Henk and I created a cleaned up version of the CBOR encoding and accompanying CDDL.
>>> We should check whether this encoding helps us and then integrate it into the document.
>>>
>>> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fietf-teep%2Fteep-protocol%2Fpull%2F27&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7C85cf47c432354e5fa73a08d7dc903817%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220384303337245&amp;sdata=ZDVr31cNQdQNR5H2bcvnC%2Bj7m%2BDgVz1kIe4us99%2B%2BsA%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>>
>>> Grüße, Carsten
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TEEP mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fteep&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7C85cf47c432354e5fa73a08d7dc903817%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220384303337245&amp;sdata=CG21OuaA8t16%2BzyvSFazbG3l2sEpc9sa8trHUmX5TBI%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Suit mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fsuit&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cakira.tsukamoto%40aist.go.jp%7C85cf47c432354e5fa73a08d7dc903817%7C18a7fec8652f409b8369272d9ce80620%7C0%7C0%7C637220384303337245&amp;sdata=Cc9I9ZFT4Ms%2BI198MQw%2B78aJxlDsTlH0EonuB%2B7rKUg%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>