Re: Charter Update
Bob Smart <smart@mel.dit.csiro.au> Tue, 22 June 1993 00:44 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13989; 21 Jun 93 20:44 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13985; 21 Jun 93 20:44 EDT
Received: from timbuk.cray.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19347; 21 Jun 93 20:44 EDT
Received: from hemlock.cray.com by cray.com (4.1/CRI-MX 2.19) id AA13268; Mon, 21 Jun 93 19:44:46 CDT
Received: by hemlock.cray.com id AA19387; 4.1/CRI-5.6; Mon, 21 Jun 93 19:44:41 CDT
Received: from cray.com (timbuk.cray.com) by hemlock.cray.com id AA19383; 4.1/CRI-5.6; Mon, 21 Jun 93 19:44:37 CDT
Received: from shark.mel.dit.csiro.au by cray.com (4.1/CRI-MX 2.19) id AA13265; Mon, 21 Jun 93 19:44:32 CDT
Received: from squid.mel.dit.CSIRO.AU by shark.mel.dit.csiro.au with SMTP id AA27663 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4/DIT-1.3 for <telnet-ietf@cray.com>); Tue, 22 Jun 1993 10:44:45 +1000
Received: by squid.mel.dit.CSIRO.AU (4.1/SMI-4.0) id AA06814; Tue, 22 Jun 93 10:44:26 EST
Message-Id: <9306220044.AA06814@squid.mel.dit.CSIRO.AU>
To: telnet-ietf@cray.com
Subject: Re: Charter Update
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Jun 93 15:40:21 EST." <9306212040.AA04567@ra.i88.isc.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1993 10:44:25 +1000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Bob Smart <smart@mel.dit.csiro.au>
>Also, do you think there is value in having the group around just to act >as a clearing-house for Telnet proposals. I doubt if WGs can or should stick around without specific work objectives. >Nov 1993 Publish authentication/encryption option as Proposed Standard We'll need an implementation (preferably 2). I'm not competent to do one, but I'd like to co-operate with someone who is. I am interested in adding X.509-based authentication and encryption. I've done it by modifying the Telnet code that supported the previous encryption option proposal but that is now defunct. Bob Smart
- Charter Update Steve Alexander
- Re: Charter Update Marjo Mercado
- Re: Charter Update Bob Smart