Going about requesting new TELOPT Options
Joe Croft <jcroft@unicomp.net> Tue, 06 February 1996 18:24 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16919; 6 Feb 96 13:24 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16915; 6 Feb 96 13:24 EST
Received: from timbuk.cray.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11003; 6 Feb 96 13:24 EST
Received: from ironwood.cray.com (daemon@ironwood-fddi.cray.com [128.162.21.36]) by timbuk.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-gate-8-2.11) with ESMTP id MAA29423; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:21:11 -0600
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ironwood.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-ccm_serv-8-2.8) id MAA24560 for telnet-ietf_list@sdiv; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:16:22 -0600
Received: from t2.cray.com (root@t2 [128.162.19.5]) by ironwood.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-ccm_serv-8-2.8) with ESMTP id MAA24554 for <telnet-ietf@ironwood.cray.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:16:21 -0600
Received: from timbuk.cray.com (root@timbuk.cray.com [128.162.19.7]) by t2.cray.com (8.6.12/craymail-smart) with ESMTP id MAA23169 for <telnet-ietf@cray.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:16:16 -0600
Received: from croftj.reliance.com (jcroft@[204.181.194.64]) by timbuk.cray.com (8.6.12/CRI-gate-8-2.11) with ESMTP id MAA28730 for <telnet-ietf@cray.com>; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:16:10 -0600
Received: (from jcroft@localhost) by croftj.reliance.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id MAA00573; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 12:04:03 -0600
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1996 12:04:02 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Joe Croft <jcroft@unicomp.net>
X-Sender: jcroft@croftj.reliance.com
To: telnet-ietf@cray.com
Subject: Going about requesting new TELOPT Options
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960206115701.552A-100000@croftj.reliance.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi Yall, Here at work I stumbled on the need to emulate a terminal server (say like an Equinox ELS Terminal Sefver) to access RS232 ports over an TCP/IP network. The obvious solution was to use the Telnet protocol. In doing this, I found the need for 3 new options, at this time, I'm using unused TELOPT equates, but I'm sure that this will bite me sooner or later as Yall come up w/ new options. What I would like to know is, How do I propose these new options to Yall to take them into consideration to be added to the standard? Thanks, Joe Croft
- Going about requesting new TELOPT Options Joe Croft
- Re: Going about requesting new TELOPT Options Theodore Ts'o