IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 03 May 2021 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617623A1B73 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wGMF3kJuxwT5 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB033A1B76 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 09:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:d032:886:7542:7114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF11B600349; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:38:56 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1620059936; bh=n4ErvB7YeEpbCZA+FJU7Ut9eT8x5DPMd6hq3EzwpfPA=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=w1JrJ3Jl89c+92TylHnuk0+2eJwBDak23oUALazqipHOh3NS32jk2YI/YEl2XPfBE P5gtaTv4ewfN5W6heO6oOqMxtI3MRRAUjg2v8o/2MXt3Kpn3OKkiwrNeUtItfKs+YU Uv05rrWFZ4qq6jDHhfYFqJPquKJPgYB3eZE9E56o=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <23BB90A4-5BE3-4685-95D3-BD59D4FB4EA1@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_943BF346-9961-4EEB-8B6E-2ADABC5CDF08"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 19:38:56 +0300
In-Reply-To: <E6222D35-3D6D-48E0-A173-418DE8328DFE@akamai.com>
Cc: "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <0D099A46-15A9-4427-A587-262897D9A722@eggert.org> <7E1939F9-57F3-4702-ADDE-EB4982A396A8@akamai.com> <17EAAD0D-7CE1-4756-AABC-F48728152B70@eggert.org> <FC5AD0C4-C4DF-4D9F-BBFF-BCA574C0D6C2@akamai.com> <B095E7AD-5276-4A70-A2BA-59CE1E8D5DC6@eggert.org> <E6222D35-3D6D-48E0-A173-418DE8328DFE@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-MailScanner-ID: AF11B600349.A08DE
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/24XITCz9suwtCCs0h1gMrusxyBM>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 16:39:14 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-5-3, at 19:35, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>  the IESG hasn't discussed this yet. My personal view is that it would likely take the form of an IESG statement.
> 
> That's fine.  But please, unless/until that (or something similar) happens, please don't abandon the TERM charter.

agreed. I will take TERM off the telechat agenda on Thursday, however.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email