IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] Update to TERM charter text

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 13 April 2021 15:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183323A1BAA for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:39:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BTXhREfq0Msu for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p226.piuha.net [193.234.219.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622813A1BAF for <terminology@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 08:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5024B6601E7; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:39:39 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sk5irFhYfT0l; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:39:38 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [193.234.219.226]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6584866012D; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:39:38 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <9CC26797-B2EF-4E24-8F48-09DEDF8F6697@eggert.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:39:37 +0300
Cc: terminology@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A34FB381-6B40-42D9-AB10-1C0E33DBC5D2@piuha.net>
References: <8143F715-9D83-4C15-B441-D0D8CA302C50@eggert.org> <D5FEBE8C-14D4-48BD-AAE7-9436E296CB7E@eggert.org> <ed88e91a-1224-4918-710e-dfe6e5c89df4@digitaldissidents.org> <9191f3bd-d52a-4fa4-b117-79b3bb517cdf@www.fastmail.com> <6a54335a-b033-60a1-a431-ba92954527cc@digitaldissidents.org> <F89896BC-7654-4EF0-99FF-43C2E1AB74E8@eggert.org> <31add831-4c5f-315d-3070-1633cdcd032b@digitaldissidents.org> <9CC26797-B2EF-4E24-8F48-09DEDF8F6697@eggert.org>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/65v83MiABKhPIpO-Nlw6eWsd7z4>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Update to TERM charter text
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:39:43 -0000

Thanks for the explanation of the process, Lars. I agree that this is the right way forward, and happy to see the second review. This is by the way indeed the usual process. Proposals get reviewed firstly by some set of people and that set expands later, and in the end IETF consensus is what matters.

Lars has the difficult task of trying to see if he can find a charter that is acceptable to a broad set of IETF participants, under somewhat polarised feedback :-) FWIW, I think that it is possible, and involves more WG driven decisions and just guidance from the new working group. Of course, in the process it may be that not all of us get what we would optimally want, if we didn’t have to find that common consensus.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email