[Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 03 May 2021 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC9E3A17A3 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 03:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=0.5, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xg2Cyqfdrb4o for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 03:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B2E3A179E for <terminology@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 03:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:2538:b2e0:2cfb:3a19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE206600349 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:14:55 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1620036895; bh=PxPq18cyMukRJo8iPTXj9fkUVP2yApVSVc7BuAC2hSo=; h=From:Subject:Date:To; b=W2S4ZBUnFKmuqJw2C7bRgF45AcHnLTpo95v7SpxCarurfTpp2Cz9/+cWaJY//uwDV Mxg2TY6zIJycnGV01u1jyfnes1bYmesljqA/QTVUeUS+4tN4K+IbjMKumPHuIyPJyb 4f4g6Do2GQuy1CXknKL4gNEgAFcefRJJK9y3hxV4=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_50254E10-04AB-4192-91CF-49CE2B1AA1DF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Message-Id: <0D099A46-15A9-4427-A587-262897D9A722@eggert.org>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2021 13:14:54 +0300
To: "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-MailScanner-ID: DE206600349.A1E7A
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/8mrwmUBT5GSDTT-GFZlM2kjknGo>
Subject: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 10:15:32 -0000

Hi,

thank you all for the feedback over the last few days.

It seems like we have broad consensus to refer to NISTIR 8366 (https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8366) to provide guidance to IETF contributors on using inclusive terminology, in lieu of documenting our own guidance.

I'm therefore planning to do the following:

(1) abandon the chartering of the proposed TERM WG

(2) suggest to the IESG to recommend NISTIR 8366 as guidance
    to contributors to the IETF

(3) suggest to the RFC Editor to recommend NISTIR 8366 as guidance
    to authors of I-Ds and RFCs

Thanks,
Lars Eggert
IETF Chair