IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 03 May 2021 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08793A171D for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S8ssif_EUBYm for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A626B3A171B for <terminology@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:58:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 143Et7Ru013891; Mon, 3 May 2021 15:58:38 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=AjJIo1v8rgXCCNCbdvAWjnM20WRl1Mm3t6Je5+lqYeQ=; b=JoRXpEM/f8kRgvmubgOzUQqA3MNG0U5e0RJs+2YyDAqswSudRFdUwXctdd5B2lIh9eOK maJCjdl2RE8hLJo5vxMyb/jNsvqHva6N414iceP9JX2OT5jDEKIy8VRiQj5hASKci71f qUhQSxT3EbpdE3BNNDqxsKqbN9WMdoeO1xeNLVe1oBR/XtefuD/jdssTjnTnxAuL1fah 3BtYW7/fRlkahUu++br58PoZA4XjnqYJqOAu4NRmFFUKe4M+3tCLOATMyNnWEnoUAXuj PUUlxTjY/s+uUEpRcODTHx5AVz/GyW5m9ymOPKgZcDFY2SKx7zMShloSRtPD1gFHZ9ap zA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38a061akj2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 May 2021 15:58:38 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 143EoLc3016359; Mon, 3 May 2021 07:58:37 -0700
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 3894ybyhes-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 May 2021 07:58:37 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:58:36 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.012; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:58:36 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
Thread-Index: AQHXQAVFiCBhBlLNNUeP8lJKTRTvFqrR2YkA
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 14:58:35 +0000
Message-ID: <7E1939F9-57F3-4702-ADDE-EB4982A396A8@akamai.com>
References: <0D099A46-15A9-4427-A587-262897D9A722@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <0D099A46-15A9-4427-A587-262897D9A722@eggert.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.48.21041102
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <4AC9229C6B0E39448710707164927AE1@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-03_10:2021-05-03, 2021-05-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=836 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105030103
X-Proofpoint-GUID: a3A5cHalPH544gSkZ-lCIfIa1ycZDoG6
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: a3A5cHalPH544gSkZ-lCIfIa1ycZDoG6
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-03_10:2021-05-03, 2021-05-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=785 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104060000 definitions=main-2105030104
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 184.51.33.60) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/EThBMw-QBMtBbVtiieBp34ZHPMs>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 14:58:51 -0000

>    (2) suggest to the IESG to recommend NISTIR 8366 as guidance
        to contributors to the IETF

>    (3) suggest to the RFC Editor to recommend NISTIR 8366 as guidance
        to authors of I-Ds and RFCs

Is there something actionable or observable in those?  Like, for example, how will we know if the IESG or the RFC Editor agree or disagree, and where could we look to see?

Please don't abandon the TERM effort until we can tell that the suggestions have been taken up.  It is an interesting question, to me and probably out of ignorance, where draft authors look for guidance.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email