Re: [Terminology] Update to TERM charter text

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 14 April 2021 06:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD293A0ECC for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SiMQuhAPsBi7 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6098B3A0EBD for <terminology@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2021 23:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:58b8:dd01:5c90:2248] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:58b8:dd01:5c90:2248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 36163600336; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:47:12 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1618382832; bh=5IitTUZhsxFJHDEggmgE0mCJAvZI4K3oVtZEJVLl7yk=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=M6gRVZ6J1EjrftXV/9RG1vgN4/4kr+IgbssCptG7+M2TTpA0OHNNmteiQEsx6jbei Zb4A6SyF9Ej+1Jp0SWQ9Gcj9s9Nz//lS4YHsQOi7qvLFJ3LRrr1V6tTGvH2cJsjUB9 /cwKfFTKvwXVYH3LYoSI++67p4vWaf3PLxtlsiwc=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <5D5555C0-7B9A-4A48-8DDC-16D264510801@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C0A11B7E-DF0B-46F7-9DFB-5ABFFE83D76B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 09:47:11 +0300
In-Reply-To: <5E9FE170-8600-4F28-AF38-C6F8C4960111@episteme.net>
Cc: Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>, Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org>, terminology@ietf.org
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>
References: <8143F715-9D83-4C15-B441-D0D8CA302C50@eggert.org> <D5FEBE8C-14D4-48BD-AAE7-9436E296CB7E@eggert.org> <ed88e91a-1224-4918-710e-dfe6e5c89df4@digitaldissidents.org> <9191f3bd-d52a-4fa4-b117-79b3bb517cdf@www.fastmail.com> <6a54335a-b033-60a1-a431-ba92954527cc@digitaldissidents.org> <CANMZLAb4wHudyNCr+m7VosqfMz=nzKtt54thb8pCQS8kKoisMw@mail.gmail.com> <50b0ee01-f587-b132-4305-5241b01cbaca@cdt.org> <cd599df3-aea0-c529-44a1-5da96e3eb12d@gmail.com> <CAGVFjMLJjWE=N_cH=ESrDLV8C09QeTXC=Ojkqdm9WX7O72hUOg@mail.gmail.com> <5E9FE170-8600-4F28-AF38-C6F8C4960111@episteme.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-MailScanner-ID: 36163600336.AE5BF
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/IiqSVMSvoflYKULi1CCtT2nyc4U>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Update to TERM charter text
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:47:31 -0000

Hi,

Pete summarizes the considerations and trade-offs for AD-sponsored document publication quite well; thanks for that.

I'd also point out this IESG statement, which has more information on the AD-sponsored process and their trade-offs: https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/area-director-sponsoring-documents/

Thanks,
Lars