Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 03 May 2021 10:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570283A1835 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 03:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JtegfMNwjj3F for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 May 2021 03:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39DF83A1834 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 May 2021 03:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:2538:b2e0:2cfb:3a19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A03F600349; Mon, 3 May 2021 13:26:26 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1620037586; bh=4gDg2vDGXvX00s7VZYkwZxLFXAw1+cvYSbp4O8VqRK8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=CzW562Or4B26Ka+Oh7vLgKcRUFbmYDdy7Ti/j1GfVroIgF7zn7msSmR0DuoLfZlcI La2pHToid8ZfEUulE1w6BUyVJwIwjDXtxHS8o68zASjloOi/wh889nYgbf+EbWot8O q2lnytwPV/59DoNTJ25BrmK6710mpcsmDcJNzAXI=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <755FC807-5782-420E-BD04-2DABAE533BD8@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_133E6A2F-B0E4-4C7B-BAE6-93C3D697E3FB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\))
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 13:26:25 +0300
In-Reply-To: <AF877D29-FB21-42E1-BEE5-F03E40AEF37D@cisco.com>
Cc: "terminology@ietf.org" <terminology@ietf.org>
To: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <0D099A46-15A9-4427-A587-262897D9A722@eggert.org> <AF877D29-FB21-42E1-BEE5-F03E40AEF37D@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43)
X-MailScanner-ID: 0A03F600349.A1BBF
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/W6tifLsWJbl5xTWWzUPsm1KNHzY>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] TERM & NISTIR 8366
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 10:26:38 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-5-3, at 13:23, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> I would suggest that you let NIST know the we are doing this, so that they might update their content relating to the IETF.

I will contact NIST to inform them we'll be referring to their guidance.

>  Unless there are strong objections, I also suggest that the terminology@ietf.org list be maintained so that further industry developments can be tracked and considered by those who are interested.

Yes, I was planning to leave this list up (and was also planning to mention this in the earlier email, but forgot.)

Thanks,
Lars