IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Terminology] Rejecting kings and such

Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> Sun, 07 November 2021 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@lear.ch>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B01273A1189 for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 01:29:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lear.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dksNKbstHiDf for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 01:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (upstairs.ofcourseimright.com [185.32.222.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B69CE3A10D6 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 01:29:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:420:c0c0:1011::1] ([IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1011:0:0:0:1]) (authenticated bits=0) by upstairs.ofcourseimright.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-18) with ESMTPSA id 1A79TEvs467740 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <terminology@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 10:29:15 +0100
Authentication-Results: upstairs.ofcourseimright.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lear.ch
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=lear.ch; s=upstairs; t=1636277355; bh=MDBXocoTXgUlnNorhfWnjCb7dFTfjHRyTaseJo4r39E=; h=Date:To:References:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=rdhgzLzEMiOxbawbwz1Cw1GUPKj19g2dCevUrisNlQiWwVKEFd6mWbI2ZAPuZvLC5 SvElGw6xJga5ro3Duj/SKTHVOr7xFI9LXAuJ9D+QaYOOs2b0eCq7qUQasU1q76ccDc DFqV0xtIxeU+VTqsUPaplhneILosGvUOrnbbXTpE=
Message-ID: <1cbbb4c1-5b15-ac9d-5c12-514d4e78dc16@lear.ch>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 10:29:11 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: terminology@ietf.org
References: <BY5PR11MB419686515616F100D00EA0AFB58D9@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAFfrZstPj8ZmQNrv5AG_u3soHsu0t=rKzc8OisFwpWtgz3GAhw@mail.gmail.com> <c4f4eebd-aa65-706d-e895-65e0a8034e2b@lounge.org> <97010687-1efa-470d-aab3-a2209c644e7f@dogfood.fastmail.com>
From: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <97010687-1efa-470d-aab3-a2209c644e7f@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------LSD02OOUsIS73FKqs218dQtE"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/bsJK53M7PaMNyFa5Nj7MGo_DOjo>
Subject: [Terminology] Rejecting kings and such
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 09:29:26 -0000

Let's not misconstrue Clark's statement to excuse poor behavior, 
something he surely never intended.  That does a deep disservice to him.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email