Re: [Terminology] Recent posts to the terminology mailing list

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Sun, 07 November 2021 06:02 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: terminology@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3D43A101D for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=Gc0+AQUY; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=S7pEk347
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P2qhLxgzxI5d for <terminology@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65703A101C for <terminology@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 23:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405463200A16 for <terminology@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 01:02:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap43 ([10.202.2.93]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 07 Nov 2021 01:02:28 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=m3wg4Ow CREqQ/cGJCertX4RGej8TQ7w97ryLyAJLgEQ=; b=Gc0+AQUYd+YY6oPb6OLpU8Z qu5qZ0wk/TWAxaCr3X5Ix9ftplB5QcdBQ/OJvMgeaAEhjNroLxGOTEvu892+iq0H Y59aySspVDCi8s2xEdI6jDxXVa0oG7o7VeZ3UV0qsRWRWo3vcyPlognoRCVKf5kP S+kfuhUZ0+XMObjHqdht5FhuaDw5jLQdmf5gHu+SkwUytb47+ApqL3fbCDeD2QAP hR3i7XKwjvV496GmPVxViu4ZFy6yxnkl1D5In+pIEyEPE0Deq572/svMu/p21nhc neMBRyfSt8QlYlidZPcOTDRlhnBDHat2xQzBM/XY6sQlHn0pt0bPgf+rPfJBjyw= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=m3wg4O wCREqQ/cGJCertX4RGej8TQ7w97ryLyAJLgEQ=; b=S7pEk347EGSLtna/eUe2vl dyDiLPfbT1JeVJoQ/gx5J+nLAUc5sNLgsWAiICOfD6ttcI/18xNPSjDItfq3tmfi 9YomwH+bdf05ddlJLhn06dUvMi5r9k6W4zgCvFPoXLKlLxnErll8hI25ib55T535 Gw8yZ1VoGLrIMTeP+2HHN6Qg+ZH7jl14oiaWJ+5+dXQAF2WUqkK26C2Af5uTehMt H0AHHkRb2jevb3P+03g4S+5eji4X6rLottFMAkBb+NV2ZL9bW1iIMOw+bE9vnn+s gqPKqF3VdSlj+KT9Vq2JD1uW9tjwsS462rofECWGQbui5jYYzuHJk5myneC+FzcA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:82uHYYFg7TBf9EVVX4k-JBmDy90BCbcX9dhk50-gZs09yB-ZKGtHbw> <xme:82uHYRUZqDYygYkRRGUEij2rsNquz_16T4zyBUXfZw_YSFsHTBBzRbR-D0m5kt6Kw Asugc49rLc>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrtdelgdekhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesrgdtre erreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhhonhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehf rghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdduueeihefgvd ehueeujeejuedugfeigfevteefleetfeffgfdtjeejgfeuuddvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrih hlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:82uHYSLk15imRGj1V2Mg13A3NC-1xHqyNu5rFoTuMsnW6SOlH5kq9Q> <xmx:82uHYaEaHhv75tne9xuc1GrMUv7n5fTjiDuK0fXA3RdMluwNubrzEg> <xmx:82uHYeXAbf6hsFGmSsNgGzC1i_ssQZG562HHo9dp8k9QEclyxPixxA> <xmx:82uHYWj6flvCPTKYRYJB8w3Qlr_r-Nvusq6TLXPuB2ogvvruuikjEg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 67FA2AC0DD1; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 01:02:27 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-1420-gdf09e8761c-fm-20211101.001-gdf09e876
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <97010687-1efa-470d-aab3-a2209c644e7f@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <c4f4eebd-aa65-706d-e895-65e0a8034e2b@lounge.org>
References: <BY5PR11MB419686515616F100D00EA0AFB58D9@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAFfrZstPj8ZmQNrv5AG_u3soHsu0t=rKzc8OisFwpWtgz3GAhw@mail.gmail.com> <c4f4eebd-aa65-706d-e895-65e0a8034e2b@lounge.org>
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 17:01:55 +1100
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: terminology@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="d731f9439fea4ba4ae202e46a65564a5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/terminology/pjq7Luz47Z5LtsDSQJh-TTWqTEQ>
Subject: Re: [Terminology] Recent posts to the terminology mailing list
X-BeenThere: terminology@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Effective Terminology in IETF Documents <terminology.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/terminology/>
List-Post: <mailto:terminology@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/terminology>, <mailto:terminology-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2021 06:02:37 -0000

On Sun, Nov 7, 2021, at 14:03, Dan Harkins wrote:
> 
> On 11/5/21 2:02 PM, Nick Doty wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 4:34 PM Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I've recently joined Lars and Sean as a co-moderator for this list.
>> 
>> Thank you for helping with moderation of this list, which is needed.
> 
> Old and busted: We reject kings, presidents, and voting.
> 
> New hotness: We need moderators on our mailing lists so no one gets offended.
>  

Nah, we only need moderators because some people like picking at scabs and trying to get them bleeding again.


Some people do that by sending their drafts to the ISE when it's clear that they aren't going to get IETF consensus, but they still want to get IETF branding and an RFC number next to their words.

And some do it by posting repeated snarky and cynically sarcastic comments at people who are trying to help.


Nobody wins when we just keep being mean to each other, as I'm sad to have seen both you Lloyd doing over the past couple of days on this list.


Obviously the problem of "who decides who is the moderator" is a real problem.  But you're right, the Old and busted does need to be updated.

*New hotness: We reject kings, presidents, voting, and sarcastic unproductive dialogue.*


There's a way to address issues with draft-knodel-terminology - personally I sent my review directly to the ISE since he's the one tasked with the unfortunate and thankless job of working out whether it's appropriate for publication.

Continuing to pick away and try to damage the community here because it doesn't 100% behave how you'd like is not a winning way to persuade the ISE, or honestly a great to persuade others that you have views worth listening to.

Which frustrates me - because sometimes I agree with you, but it's really hard to separate the bits I agree with from hyperbole and catastrophization, that damage rather than increase communication.

Regards,

Bron.
--
  Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
  brong@fastmailteam.com