Re: [TERNLI] Notes from tonight's ad hoc

Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU> Wed, 02 August 2006 04:38 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G88Ua-0004Ty-Iq; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:38:00 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G88UZ-0004Tl-6L for ternli@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:37:59 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G88UX-0003JF-Sd for ternli@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:37:59 -0400
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (static-71-246-51-26.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.246.51.26]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id k724bVY29680; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20060728125608.670AF444391@lawyers.icir.org>
References: <20060728125608.670AF444391@lawyers.icir.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-7-92593450"
Message-Id: <94176DAD-C2FC-4018-8A15-005606394435@isi.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [TERNLI] Notes from tonight's ad hoc
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:37:32 -0700
To: mallman@icir.org
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: falk@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Cc: ternli@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ternli@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport-Enhancing Refinements to the Network Layer Interface <ternli.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ternli>, <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ternli>
List-Post: <mailto:ternli@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ternli>, <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ternli-bounces@ietf.org

On Jul 28, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Mark Allman wrote:

>   + Giving a generic signal that *something* has changed and it likely
>     matters and so the transport should re-init itself (e.g.,  
> forget the
>     SRTT, RTTVAR, cwnd, ssthresh, MTU value, etc.).

Perhaps the signal should be that congestion state or RTT estimate is  
no longer valid.  I.e., make the signal have transport semantics.

--aaron