Re: [TERNLI] Notes from tonight's ad hoc

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Wed, 02 August 2006 15:07 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8IKF-0003QR-EN; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:07:59 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8IKD-0003QM-Rq for ternli@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:07:57 -0400
Received: from [2001:630:241:204:203:baff:fe9a:8c9b] (helo=erg.abdn.ac.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8IKC-0005aH-BW for ternli@ietf.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 11:07:57 -0400
Received: from [139.133.207.154] (dhcp-207-154.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.207.154]) by erg.abdn.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k72F7kEr010339; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:07:46 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <44D0BFC3.7040504@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:07:47 +0100
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: University of Aberdeen, UK
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [TERNLI] Notes from tonight's ad hoc
References: <20060728125608.670AF444391@lawyers.icir.org> <94176DAD-C2FC-4018-8A15-005606394435@isi.edu> <44D0B465.7060902@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <44D0B465.7060902@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ERG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ERG-MailScanner-From: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2
Cc: Aaron Falk <falk@ISI.EDU>, ternli@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ternli@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
List-Id: Transport-Enhancing Refinements to the Network Layer Interface <ternli.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ternli>, <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ternli>
List-Post: <mailto:ternli@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ternli>, <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ternli-bounces@ietf.org

Joe Touch wrote:

> 
> Aaron Falk wrote:
> 
>>On Jul 28, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Mark Allman wrote:
>>
>>
>>>  + Giving a generic signal that *something* has changed and it likely
>>>    matters and so the transport should re-init itself (e.g., forget the
>>>    SRTT, RTTVAR, cwnd, ssthresh, MTU value, etc.).
>>
>>Perhaps the signal should be that congestion state or RTT estimate is no
>>longer valid.  I.e., make the signal have transport semantics.
> 
> 
> That is what I was afraid of - that means that the link knows what the
> network is doing, e.g., whether it is using the link for CBR or bursty
> traffic, etc.
> 
> Joe
> 

It isn't clear to me yet that the idea of transport semantics is useful...

If say, the link has a substantial change in RTT: this obviously effects 
the RTO in TCP (how much depends upon how much the total path RTT 
changes), the signal could impact what a sender stores to calculate the 
SRTT -  perhaps it also means that you may have to change other things 
(such as cwnd), but links don't really know the implications on the 
transport ...

Gorry