IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [TERNLI] Notes from tonight's ad hoc

Michael Welzl <Michael.Welzl@uibk.ac.at> Fri, 28 July 2006 12:19 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6RJn-0005so-Fe; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:19:51 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6RJl-0005si-Qz for ternli@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:19:49 -0400
Received: from lmr1.uibk.ac.at ([138.232.1.142] helo=smtp.uibk.ac.at) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G6RJk-0006AL-Bv for ternli@ietf.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:19:49 -0400
Received: from localhost (lwm2.uibk.ac.at [138.232.1.161]) by smtp.uibk.ac.at (8.13.1/8.13.1/F1) with ESMTP id k6SCJhKe017603; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:19:43 +0200
Received: from 30-6-248.wireless.csail.mit.edu (30-6-248.wireless.csail.mit.edu [128.30.6.248]) by web-mail2.uibk.ac.at (IMP) with HTTP for <c70370@mail1.uibk.ac.at>; Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:19:43 +0200
Message-ID: <1154089183.44ca00df115c3@web-mail2.uibk.ac.at>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:19:43 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <Michael.Welzl@uibk.ac.at>
To: kfall@intel.com
Subject: RE: [TERNLI] Notes from tonight's ad hoc
References: <002301c6b23f$a3ef4a90$0300a8c0@kfallmobl>
In-Reply-To: <002301c6b23f$a3ef4a90$0300a8c0@kfallmobl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6
X-Originating-IP: 128.30.6.248
X-Forwarded-For:
X-Spam-Score: -7.4 () ALL_TRUSTED,RCV_SMTP_UIBK,RCV_WEBMAIL
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.52 at uibk.ac.at on 138.232.1.140
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: ternli@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ternli@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport-Enhancing Refinements to the Network Layer Interface <ternli.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ternli>, <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ternli>
List-Post: <mailto:ternli@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ternli>, <mailto:ternli-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ternli-bounces@ietf.org

Zitat von Kevin Fall <kfall@intel.com>:

> I'm not sure how clear-cut it is.  E.g..  a path change might imply a
> likelihood of a significant capacity and latency change.  A capacity change
> due only to modulation change would likely affect the latency less
> drammatically, I would think.  On the "other other" hand, the system could
> generate two indicators on a path change :P.

yep: two indicators.

cheers,
michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email