Re: [therightkey] trans WG approved by IESG

Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> Fri, 14 February 2014 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB631A03F7 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:48:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y9Jn-whzkleg for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24C81A031E for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:47:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z11so8665435lbi.26 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:47:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=k8VJEfs2T6mQE+7EoKezez8SgP3hBY7RhBjmukg3yAU=; b=xLDJe9K9WEdC/JDew5uCN3ihIT0HfwEHrKpkkhN0GoCRf3d76Yoy+bu4sIhQYF0l0I GRAt0g9ZK/ojK3fmGNLbi0KMh7m5MV33fsV3zc6R+jsM7XQRbueZmQcelolE/NOXUxkX /ww5B1zz8P4bCRzeOg6+83OUBh60yKelWdMSJccq/6uCB1ic93uZNn3cxAXH6eOebZfh swK6yq2FZlJHUMolm95bbfRpu21Q8dZSUydUHp8UaPA7JL84IJL4vrE2AWovrbzj+pox QxLEWlsl92W4LCToN5yNQJTMkatcVZkV1qDTlWeAp8SpafUKFUrxopwB9iEY9/t1V0td j1Aw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.114.228 with SMTP id jj4mr6875343lbb.13.1392418075151; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:47:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.37.168 with HTTP; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 14:47:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52FE9BB3.6050808@gmail.com>
References: <52F3E0A0.1080306@cs.tcd.ie> <52FE9025.2090700@cs.tcd.ie> <52FE9BB3.6050808@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:47:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwjEULM06eZqKuCN7gQAM5_oU59GDDWgWSa9SNV9HO+V_Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
To: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134cbfcbf944a04f2659893"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/therightkey/1DLJA2WCSdQjoiJwhLM4SfznsZg
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] trans WG approved by IESG
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:48:04 -0000

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi, folks:
>
> I am *extremely* pleased to be involved with this effort and
> am very optimistic about the working group's results.  I'm
> hopeful that we can ramp up pretty quickly, and there are a
> few things we'll need to take care of straight out of the gate:
>
> 1) we'll need to identify milestones around document adoption
>    and publication,
>
> 2) we'll need to adopt documents as working group drafts
>
> 3) We should probably figure out if we want to move the
>    mailing list from "therightkey" to "trans"
>

Yes, definitely. My experience is that WGs get told to get with the program
and align their names anyway.

But even if not, therightkey will still be useful for the more speculative
stuff some of us are doing.

I am not going to build my email scheme that involves CT like approaches
direct on CT for WebPKI because that is research on research which is a bad
idea.


-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/