IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Thu, 12 December 2013 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F175A1AC85E for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:11:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MJIdgOQRa97R for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com (mail-bk0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E5D1AD739 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:11:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id my13so837887bkb.22 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:11:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=d5GLjdiarPY57rFZoolaNIrDtH+DGLqqATOLUdswioA=; b=dCXvV0LV2LT9KiqNAolAeZFeCe2HASJbSO7MKvgWxSnufgQLPEjlo2C96y4Vfx9fo/ +LvoI+Kks/VY//hXWc/abAaktw3b+Qqd6BJ2w/mWCp1udww78uMfxg8kWvyUVh1KuSXF 22NPh3Z+OkPyTO21vUzVsXQ5Zb5NqLkUHCBpnKxq6pecGt9u01FFwyBjKzaXbp8Qnigd We1RwizzYuorxgj7H/821i1hy95a+sMbtUSvrZ5YGpNl+IAsq1qpP+T11zzW2o1Hfun2 rc+cC590HhvNq9sbyv7ZwJSTDhKfjpYB/YQiFku3EUL2bAb0rF/iEa3VZ63sDroaFYCB NaKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7Zs+tH/kUSvROGweyDRoH8pJV5VoMxLjh4dpbagFgwuAnEk1GILnpVHeMhs2FtmmhMbKr
X-Received: by 10.204.101.199 with SMTP id d7mr2768402bko.18.1386850285936; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:6b0:7:0:4c4a:4e98:5268:4137? ([2001:6b0:7:0:4c4a:4e98:5268:4137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q5sm12973991bkr.5.2013.12.12.04.11.24 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:11:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52A9A7EB.9070101@mnt.se>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:11:23 +0100
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
References: <CABrd9SSzGJy18tf_iR5jFNk-sJyX66OPhmM4H23K5X2ZpWniyQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312111248560.4894@bofh.nohats.ca> <CABrd9SRs1PP2O4KJaq6zpdxAsR-7JpVMK_gwh8RXnLfwgQA+-w@mail.gmail.com> <52A8D234.1070303@mnt.se> <CABrd9STxw-jGLWEvUxJUCT4oSoG8oc_fMoBZ=yVtjwxf1PFtxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9STxw-jGLWEvUxJUCT4oSoG8oc_fMoBZ=yVtjwxf1PFtxQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 12:11:41 -0000

On 12/12/2013 12:09 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 11 December 2013 20:59, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
>>> As the charter suggests, we will re-charter to include such things, as
>>> they appear to become viable.
>>>
>>> I am _very_ keen to come up with more generic mechanisms.
>>>
>>> But I also have an urgent problem to solve.
>>>
>>> They are not mutually exclusive.
>>>
>> So there are various other "public ledger" projects out there, all based
>> on organic, locally sourced Merkle trees. We should probably make some
>> effort to reach out to these communities.
> Sure. Do you have a list?
I'll dig

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email