Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group

[Ben Laurie <[e-mail]>]

On 7 January 2014 16:05, Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> The deadline for meeting session requests in London is coming
> up.
>
> What I propose to do is to request a placeholder-BoF session
> for this proposed WG. That doesn't mean there'll be a BoF.
> It means that if a WG has been formed in time then there'll
> be a WG session. If WG formation doesn't look to me like
> its happening (or if the IESG/IAB push back a lot) then I'll
> cancel the session and there'll be no transparency session
> in London. The call when that decision is made will be on
> about Jan 20.
>
> So, please get the WG stuff moving along soon now if you
> want to proceed. Ideally, that'd mean some drafts would
> exist as well as the draft WG charter, before that call on
> about Jan 20. But a good charter plus RFC 6962 might be
> enough.

I will post a revised charter to a new thread shortly. I believe it
addresses all comments made so far (if it does not, its because I've
managed to miss something over the holiday, so apologies in advance).

>
> Thanks,
> S.
>
>
> On 12/11/2013 04:55 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
>> Who's in?