Re: [therightkey] WG Review: Public Notary Transparency (trans)
=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Fri, 24 January 2014 18:53 UTC
Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 5326B1A0134 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:53:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.231
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-1.231 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d09amP6kfTKm for
<therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:53:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alt-proxy31.mail.unifiedlayer.com
(alt-proxy31.mail.unifiedlayer.com [74.220.221.129]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id BFB461A013F for <therightkey@ietf.org>;
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:53:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 19392 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jan 2014 18:53:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by
oproxy17.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2014 18:53:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=kingsmountain.com; s=default;
h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID;
bh=XI/u4sOh5lH5gz2W55Bpdm4ClWBtDZ9+4sYw7rJeXIM=;
b=8Ezt6NWbbUSF6q7Bz2QruQiCGUnnE7mjifknIQOgy7IZfT0M1AHuT4czdYZbEmGJmxmAMIe+4PY7H5DKSt8kQLglhJ266tl8KpUabtQhe80F/DC46JcBpoOHZhLjCRf8;
Received: from [216.113.168.128] (port=13098 helo=[10.244.137.220]) by
box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1W6lsr-0002c7-Tv;
Fri, 24 Jan 2014 11:53:41 -0700
Message-ID: <52E2B6B4.2030803@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:53:40 -0800
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com}
{sentby:smtp auth 216.113.168.128 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Cc: IETF PKI next gen discussion list <therightkey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] WG Review: Public Notary Transparency (trans)
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>,
<mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>,
<mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:53:47 -0000
I overall support the creation of this proposed WG and it's proposed charter. Paul Lambert wrote... > > - 'Transparent Public Notary' would be better for a group name > and match the new charter more closely (versus original charter > was making an existing service Transparent) +1 HTH, =JeffH