Re: [therightkey] DNSNMC Subject line is stupid

Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com> Sat, 04 January 2014 05:33 UTC

Return-Path: <contact@taoeffect.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD841A802D for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 21:33:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.334
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kbsHxoRBkgxH for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 21:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0121A1F63 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 21:33:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7F757806E; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 21:33:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=taoeffect.com; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; s=taoeffect.com; bh=rLs24pNnOFzZbkS2x 9iHdrnf4OQ=; b=nhLEYKO3ektZ0emDlHpj+7j00sqxOI0zw2eeAOPVN9HfNbt9T Y4tkeIi56JYakWTLgL519BA97u23uTuBS/3KPwSGL9L4AZIDKU7D6JP2FFUFUUUn S6k3UP/VLfkNl6uYFkz7/zvMtMYBi0DE6rb3pr4DsTEDhfKz4f9/SrFv/0=
Received: from [192.168.1.91] (99-101-54-13.lightspeed.miamfl.sbcglobal.net [99.101.54.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: contact@taoeffect.com) by homiemail-a61.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1567F578071; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 21:33:32 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CB4C78C4-0395-46DB-B584-9D9AB4F2E75A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwj1MS1yK4Luh5VvgSa9z24UwQ6iJUsS79nkkwgQ3-7gbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 00:33:18 -0500
Message-Id: <06140551-4076-4402-ABA6-3EB78CFB9F0B@taoeffect.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwj1MS1yK4Luh5VvgSa9z24UwQ6iJUsS79nkkwgQ3-7gbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
Cc: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>, Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] DNSNMC Subject line is stupid
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 05:33:52 -0000

I agree with the criticism expressed here. There needs to be code (at the very least) that people can get their hands on and try out, before using the word "deprecated".

Thanks for pointing that out Phillip!

I'm working getting said code up on Github ASAP. The holidays and other things slowed me down a bit. It will be put up under this github group soon (this month, I expect/hope): https://github.com/okTurtles


--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.

On Jan 3, 2014, at 10:57 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> Part of my trouble with this thread is that the original proposal was presented in the way it was.
> 
> It might well be that there is a better way to do PKI than the approach Kohnfelder described in his master's thesis. But I don't think that the person who comes up with it will be describing the existing system as 'deprecated' before a single line of code is deployed.
> 
> 
> I am currently working on podcasts to describe my new approach to a general audience because getting any PKI deployed depends on buy in from people that are far outside this group and the IETF and even the techie community. 
> 
> We are not going to get change until we have real people appearing in Apple Stores and Microsoft stores asking how they can get usable secure email to protect them from [The russian mafia/ GRU/ Iran/ China/ NSA]. If Google had physical stores in malls, I would include them in that list.
> 
> 
> But we are not going to get people hassling for deployment until there is a scheme that is really right and not just 'good enough' for a group of highly motivated ideologues like ourselves.
> 
> Part of the problem with PGP and S/MIME is that people just want it to work so much that they blind themselves to the obvious defects let alone the less obvious ones. The result looks like a Palm Treo, not an iPhone. You could use the Palm to surf the Web and send email and it kinda worked without crashing more than six times a day. But people at Palm never did understand why that was so much of a problem and they never made much of an effort to make the phone really right because web on your phone is so cool it doesn't really need to be perfect... right?
> 
> When someone is so infatuated by their own idea that they describe it as 'deprecating' the existing system before they have even tried it in the real world then I don't think it is going to get very far.
> 
> 
> Anyway, I am thinking we should have international cryptography day sometime in early summer. Give some time to get code wrote.
> _______________________________________________
> therightkey mailing list
> therightkey@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey