Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Folks,

The deadline for meeting session requests in London is coming
up.

What I propose to do is to request a placeholder-BoF session
for this proposed WG. That doesn't mean there'll be a BoF.
It means that if a WG has been formed in time then there'll
be a WG session. If WG formation doesn't look to me like
its happening (or if the IESG/IAB push back a lot) then I'll
cancel the session and there'll be no transparency session
in London. The call when that decision is made will be on
about Jan 20.

So, please get the WG stuff moving along soon now if you
want to proceed. Ideally, that'd mean some drafts would
exist as well as the draft WG charter, before that call on
about Jan 20. But a good charter plus RFC 6962 might be
enough.

Thanks,
S.


On 12/11/2013 04:55 PM, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Who's in?