IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 11 December 2013 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E55D1AD8F0 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YD6Tc-aassuZ for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0731AD75F for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9BB1C80A09; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:52:19 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1386784339; bh=lsUHOKYXlcIsk/uddU05tXHRhb+w7ufaAHZBCQ+Lw/U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LaNcKuBGl6VIeLg9ipraraUoWU76311nkp2aRffMoYoOQgohKYs7p34WmQ8xHWsHZ j34CH6tWF/k8HZvEHH8MSg66HahxyKKVWtiwcvAdAtXD5OTcl9sReWxQroRbOE6ayG 5dOg74kS63v2waATpY3keQj2cpVbndnTiWc4jyQE=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC5880A04; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:52:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:52:19 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABrd9SSzGJy18tf_iR5jFNk-sJyX66OPhmM4H23K5X2ZpWniyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312111248560.4894@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <CABrd9SSzGJy18tf_iR5jFNk-sJyX66OPhmM4H23K5X2ZpWniyQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "therightkey@ietf.org" <therightkey@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [therightkey] Draft charter for a Transparency Working Group
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey/>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:52:28 -0000

On Wed, 11 Dec 2013, Ben Laurie wrote:

> Who's in?

Yes, but...

> "Problem statement: many Internet protocols require a mapping between
> some kind of identifier and some kind of key, for example, HTTPS,
> SMTPS, IPSec, DNSSEC and OpenPGP.

This is protocol agnostic (good!)

> Work items: Specify a standards-track mechanism to apply verifiable
> logs to HTTP/TLS (i.e. RFC 6962-bis).

This is not. I'd prefer to work towards a more generic
method or infrastructure, but I assume the work item is
just an example and not a limitation of the charter.

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email