Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for-DNSSEC
Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com> Sun, 18 November 2012 12:56 UTC
Return-Path: <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
X-Original-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F59621F8490 for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:56:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qInUobVW5D1e for <therightkey@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vb0-f44.google.com (mail-vb0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D37921F8456 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:56:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fc26so4637482vbb.31 for <therightkey@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:56:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=yZyM7ZabWPD1VIhp5V1gE8itYfX4wpM9UxFBYqU0Usw=; b=WA3aqlSQ96lN91TiKkK6t1tbwsKcuYclucUTgsuEXLBv53yiDV0G2O62RAUdZA2qnp hqCRFt5CRTwXMf9uLafXy1aIypCsUGiisLVQF+IxgpXAwZ1dQQbBOhNcJtqDy2J63ecJ meD4BE3q0o7sFnyXPd5P+FU+FbCGEGt7p7uGc6ekezGV5fZ3pRnzeMTA+3aaqV1DFaJ/ imwixzDGSMaJr7BjRXO+9jZSLfosCcjzISq1CE0MIal7Wif1lKokOCWeGoNHoF6DOEdy yKFyDkR3MbmdZ0MjWaTSlqwX0SkS2GtyxNSNOLTxMctcLZxTUkiBs27FhnZX5WIqaxZ+ 8gyw==
Received: by 10.52.177.130 with SMTP id cq2mr13208102vdc.102.1353243386591; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.6] (pool-173-79-110-220.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [173.79.110.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id in19sm3701193vec.1.2012.11.18.04.56.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 04:56:25 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:56:17 -0500
From: Carl Wallace <carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Message-ID: <CCCE43DA.364A9%carl@redhoundsoftware.com>
Thread-Topic: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for-DNSSEC
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1211172246050.27902@bofh.nohats.ca>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDAAX1CXEeg/kDAjr21NHs872OMuREs9y3BGP9S+rMs7qlw0N+Je3//v9vEh4dMEg5mNf6
Cc: therightkey@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for-DNSSEC
X-BeenThere: therightkey@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <therightkey.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/therightkey>
List-Post: <mailto:therightkey@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/therightkey>, <mailto:therightkey-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 12:56:28 -0000
On 11/17/12 10:57 PM, "Paul Wouters" <paul@nohats.ca> wrote: >But allowing anyone to submit "new" certificates, allows hackers to do >the same. How is this authenticated? For CT, by chaining to a given set of roots.
- [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for-DNS… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Shumon Huque
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Carl Wallace
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Paul Wouters
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Carl Wallace
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Paul Wouters
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Carl Wallace
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Ben Laurie
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Ben Laurie
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Carl Wallace
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Ben Laurie
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Carl Wallace
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Ben Laurie
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Tom Ritter
- Re: [therightkey] Defining CT-for-PKIX and CT-for… Ben Laurie