Re: Review of thinosi cookbook

Allison J Mankin <mankin@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> Mon, 18 July 1994 07:01 UTC

Via: uk.ac.ulcc.vmsfe; Mon, 18 Jul 1994 08:01:29 +0100
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Mon, 18 Jul 94 7:56 GMT
Message-Id: <199407180655.CAA08449@radegond.cmf.nrl.navy.mil>
To: P.Furniss@ulcc.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Review of thinosi cookbook
Cc: thinosi@ulcc.ac.uk, jstewart@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Jul 94 23:28:01 BST." <11220.9407132228@pluto.ulcc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 1994 02:55:44 -0400
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Allison J Mankin <mankin@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>

Hi, Peter,

Thanks for your gentle note.  I have a deadline
from the IESG to give my recommendation on thinosi
during our Friday meeting in Toronto.  They gave
me an extension and expressed some confidence that
I would survive assassination attempts and make it
to that deadline.

I do understand that these delays in progress are
frustrating to hard-working chairs and editors.
We appreciate it when you just send us frequent
kind reminders.  Since there has been this extra
six months, can you give me a bit more detail about
the state of implementations and use of the proposal?
I was slightly aware of a thin-osi effort in the
U.S. Defense Messaging System arena -- are they now
among likely users?

As to likening this delay to an ISO timetable, well, do
remember we are all volunteers on this IESG staff :).

Thank you, 

Allison / mankin@cs.wisc.edu
Transport Area Director


> Date:    Wed, 13 Jul 94 23:28:01 BST
> To:      mankin@cmf.nrl.navy.mil (Allison Mankin)
> cc:      thinosi@ulcc.ac.uk
> 
> From:    Peter Furniss <cziwprf@pluto.ulcc.ac.uk>
> Subject: Review of thinosi cookbook
> 
> Return-Path: cziwprf@pluto.ulcc.ac.uk
> Via:     uk.ac.ulcc.pluto; Wed, 13 Jul 1994 23:28:09 +0100
> Reply-To: P.Furniss@ulcc.ac.uk
> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
> Content-Type: text
> Content-Length: 734
> 
> Allison,
> 
> I gather the thinosi group is now in your Transport area. (This is the
> fourth Area the group has been in in its 18 month life !)
> 
> I am also very aware that you must be completely snowed under by the
> IPng directing, and only have a 50% chance of seeing 1 August without
> suffering an assination attempt.
> 
> But, we originally asked our then Area Director to progress the
> thinosi cookbook to informational RFC in early March, and nothing has
> happened. This is long enough for an ISO national body ballot ! What's
> happening ?
> 
> I shan't be in Toronto (clashes with an ISO meeting, and I've no
> funding anyway) but I hope you get lots of applause! (and perhaps a
> few gentle reminders from others in the thinosi group)
> 
> Peter Furniss

Review of thinosi cookbook Peter Furniss
Re: Review of thinosi cookbook Allison J Mankin
Re: Review of thinosi cookbook Peter Furniss
Re: Review of thinosi cookbook Andrew Worsley