Re: Re: call for participation
Henry Lowe <lowe@osf.org> Mon, 06 June 1994 19:15 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07419; 6 Jun 94 15:15 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07415; 6 Jun 94 15:15 EDT
Received: from sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21546; 6 Jun 94 15:15 EDT
Via: uk.ac.ulcc.vmsfe; Mon, 6 Jun 1994 19:31:51 +0100
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Mon, 6 Jun 94 19:26 GMT
Received: from postman.osf.org by sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP id <g.20426-0@sun2.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>; Mon, 6 Jun 1994 19:19:45 +0100
Received: from bubba.osf.org by postman.osf.org (5.64+/OSF 1.0) id AA26773; Mon, 6 Jun 94 13:50:28 -0400
Received: from opsmac1.osf.org by bubba.osf.org (5.65/OSF 1.0) id AA20444; Mon, 6 Jun 94 13:50:22 -0400
Message-Id: <9406061750.AA20444@bubba.osf.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 1994 13:51:57 -0000
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Henry Lowe <lowe@osf.org>
To: Terry Sullivan <FCLTPS@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu>
Subject: Re: Re: call for participation
Cc: THINOSI-request@ulcc.ac.uk, THINOSI@ulcc.ac.uk, X3T5@osf.org, 3543.1077@compuserve.com, agrawala@cs.umd.edu, Baker@forty2.enet.dec.com, baos@oss.com, colin <colin@intelsat>, conrad@oss.com, cpd@one.com, dallas@forty2.enet.dec.com, dchoi@vax2.cstp.umkc.edu, desjardi@eos.nasa.gov, devon!ed-kelly@mhs.attmail.com, dicksc@uci.com, eric@isci.com, heather@tandem.com, jmhunt@atlsita.org, kk@arinc.com, kuiper@osison.osiware.bc.ca, lee@vax2.cstp.umkc.edu, lrajchel@attmail.com, lee@huachuca-jitcosi.army.mil
X-Orig-Sender: THINOSI-request@ulcc.ac.uk
X-ULCC-Sequence: 198
X-ULCC-Recipient: ietf-archive%us.va.reston.cnri@uk.ac.nsfnet-relay
Terry, But who is going to fund the expansion you mention? Unfortunately, "filthy lucre" plays a significant role in standards - whether from the public coffers or not. Henry ---------------------------------------------- > Date: Fri, 03 Jun 94 11:29:17 EDT > From: Terry Sullivan <FCLTPS@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu> > Subject: Re: call for participation > To: Susan Hares <skh@merit.edu>, Henry Lowe <lowe@osf.org>, > THINOSI-request@Ulcc.Ac.Uk > Cc: THINOSI@ulcc.ac.uk, X3T5@osf.org, 73543.1077@compuserve.com, > agrawala@cs.umd.edu, Baker@forty2.enet.dec.com, baos@oss.com, > colin <colin%intelsat@nervm.nerdc.ufl.edu>, conrad@oss.com, > cpd@one.com, dallas@forty2.enet.dec.com, dchoi@vax2.cstp.umkc.edu, > desjardi@eos.nasa.gov, devon!ed-kelly@mhs.attmail.com, dicksc@uci.com, > eric@isci.com, heather@tandem.com, jmhunt@atlsita.org, kk@arinc.com, > kuiper@osison.osiware.bc.ca, lee@vax2.cstp.umkc.edu, > lrajchel@attmail.com, lee@huachuca-jitcosi.army.mil > In-Reply-To: Message of Thu, 02 Jun 1994 00:55:09 -0400 from <skh@merit.edu> > > > > >For those funding ISO activies, look at the words "public > >domain". A free program is more often used than one > >that costs money. Prototypes, "public domain" may have > >had more impact on why IP has succeed where ISO protocols > >failed. > > > > I Think we need to expand "public domain" beyond just programs. RFC's > are freely available online, increasing thier acceptance, and the number of > public domain implemetations. ISO standards are hard to come by and the > costs of these documents are sometimes prohibitive (exspecially on a state > budget). > > terry sullivan >
- Re: call for participation Susan Hares
- Re: call for participation Henry Lowe
- Re: call for participation Terry Sullivan
- Re: call for participation Susan Hares
- Re: Re: call for participation Henry Lowe