Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement
"Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <antti.pietilainen@nsn.com> Wed, 30 July 2008 10:42 UTC
Return-Path: <tictoc-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tictoc-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tictoc-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978B128C2F3; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tictoc@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A0C28C2F3 for <tictoc@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:42:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJUbGkpByqF9 for <tictoc@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [217.115.75.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314C228C2D5 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 03:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6UAgfBY016347 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:42:43 +0200
Received: from demuexc022.nsn-intra.net (webmail.nsn-intra.net [10.150.128.35]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m6UAgfom001050; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:42:41 +0200
Received: from demuexc024.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.11]) by demuexc022.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:42:41 +0200
Received: from FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc024.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:42:41 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:45:09 +0300
Message-ID: <B5535400D800AE498532700125ACF3DF3873BF@FIESEXC014.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <E8FCF6A615F8334CBD7F2F792C2DF128C75E61@sjmail2.symmetricom.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [TICTOC] Problem statement
Thread-Index: AcjyLjKUI9Aak8iLTOqFziYWJSs39AAANleg
References: <E8FCF6A615F8334CBD7F2F792C2DF128C75E61@sjmail2.symmetricom.com>
From: "Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <antti.pietilainen@nsn.com>
To: ext Doug Arnold <darnold@symmetricom.com>, tictoc@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jul 2008 10:42:41.0139 (UTC) FILETIME=[FDDADC30:01C8F230]
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0015228530=="
Sender: tictoc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tictoc-bounces@ietf.org
Doug, You said that the IEEE 1588 committee failed to come up with a security mechanism. However, it did come up with one in the form of a security protocol annex. It is informative and experimental but it was overviewed by NIST security experts. Consequently, I propose to re-word your statement so that the existing security annex is credited somehow. I also propose to start possible security work by seeing how far one can go with the existing annex. You might include Ron Cohen as cc so he has the option to comment. Antti ________________________________ From: tictoc-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tictoc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of ext Doug Arnold Sent: 30 July, 2008 13:23 To: tictoc@ietf.org Subject: [TICTOC] Problem statement Comment on TICTOC problem statement: draft-bryant-tictoc-probstat-02.txt The need for precise time and frequency transfer in engineered LANs is gernally met by IEEE 1588-2008. Such networks include high speed printing presses and other industrial automation applications, power utility substation sync, etc. However the 1588 committee failed to come up with a security mechanism. So secure time and frequency transfer in engineered LANs could be one of the charters for TICTOC. //Doug
_______________________________________________ TICTOC mailing list TICTOC@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc
- [TICTOC] Problem statement Doug Arnold
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Yaakov Stein
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Danny Mayer
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Greg Dowd
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Doug Arnold
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Yaakov Stein
- Re: [TICTOC] Problem statement Pietilainen, Antti (NSN - FI/Espoo)