IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements

Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com> Tue, 26 February 2013 01:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cuiyang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A212F21E818F for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:06:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XX8+UvQWGf17 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:06:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8320521E80B6 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOU22085; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:06:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:06:11 +0000
Received: from NKGEML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.34) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:06:13 +0000
Received: from NKGEML505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.31]) by nkgeml403-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.34]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:06:09 +0800
From: Cuiyang <cuiyang@huawei.com>
To: Kevin Gross <kevin.gross@avanw.com>, "odonoghue@isoc.org" <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Thread-Topic: [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
Thread-Index: AQHOE00cHgjkQ1AY0EGgWmbm6RmFSZiKHycAgAE1CxA=
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:06:08 +0000
Message-ID: <8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE21637319342@nkgeml505-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <512B4DF0.8040907@isoc.org> <CALw1_Q3fWn4V3V99MV2OZ=8x8WwUyQXyUxh9VrK0tGY0xJJpWg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALw1_Q3fWn4V3V99MV2OZ=8x8WwUyQXyUxh9VrK0tGY0xJJpWg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.48.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8CC0CB0BCAE52F46882E17828A9AE21637319342nkgeml505mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 01:06:22 -0000

Support +1

==================
Yang Cui,  Ph.D.
Huawei Technologies
cuiyang@huawei.com

发件人: tictoc-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tictoc-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Kevin Gross
发送时间: 2013年2月25日 22:40
收件人: odonoghue@isoc.org
抄送: NTP Working Group; tictoc@ietf.org
主题: Re: [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements

I support advancing this draft.

Kevin Gross
+1-303-447-0517
Media Network Consultant
AVA Networks - www.AVAnw.com<http://www.avanw.com/>, www.X192.org<http://www.X192.org>

On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org<mailto:odonoghue@isoc.org>> wrote:

This message initiates a two week TICTOC Working Group Last Call on advancing:

Title : Security Requirements of Time Synchronization Protocols in Packet Switched Networks
Author(s) : Tal Mizrahi
Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-04.txt
Pages : 32
Date : 2013-02-07

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements/

as an Informational RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last call will end on 12 March 2013.

I realize this WGLC comes right before the IETF; however, this document has been around for a long time, and it is my hope that this can be done expeditiously.

Regards,
Karen

Abstract: As time synchronization protocols are becoming increasingly common and widely deployed, concern about their exposure to various security threats is increasing. This document defines a set of security requirements for time synchronization protocols, focusing on the Precision Time Protocol (PTP) and the Network Time Protocol (NTP). This document also discusses the security impacts of time synchronization protocol practices, the time synchronization performance implications of external security practices, the dependencies between other security services and time synchronization.



_______________________________________________
TICTOC mailing list
TICTOC@ietf.org<mailto:TICTOC@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email