Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise Profile

Douglas Arnold <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com> Fri, 24 October 2014 00:17 UTC

Return-Path: <doug.arnold2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550EE1AD3CE for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:17:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.872
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.872 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKZP_ZmwL5aR for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x233.google.com (mail-yh0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A3DD1A87A4 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t59so1379148yho.38 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aJBkxrIRiU2e9d8MZjJo4rrPE9Ah+k5EVzItSfEMOZQ=; b=yElwWwK5dqx2yC6G7V/NIbFIf0W0JY4M4mDR6lIyHj4w/fJ2IAadDSjep8KXv7l3/C cozh1yJbDKLC4kuy3NM+OcLsVlBoxZXd8VETK9hv0ZviOwW+o+RmHU8UTlbaw3BokXHW 3rHSTDAcMwnTXDfoNITb0SIlLCPYs7igASGyvWjN1xL5aFogdq0pEP9lB3qxpezrMSM9 Uj9DFwWPtAA6pOWjGHwPIejhRkt7vRioZbHcgOXxjBga9zq8nXN/VEmdW9yg+2YURMOh v4h22usYt8YotfJMwYy50NFNs7+m7M6KuX50nV3tMk5+JhPyIMsU2k423ZLrqqn/6Ak1 hblA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.170.42.201 with SMTP id 192mr952292ykk.64.1414109857961; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: doug.arnold2@gmail.com
Received: by 10.64.17.38 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D061B80C.A3DED%lmontini@cisco.com>
References: <D061B80C.A3DED%lmontini@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 17:17:37 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: k9BiMOuw9IPOfrER8BcAcuk947Y
Message-ID: <CACQYgzEW6DCezmgwoZGQ-grC0SyB_r5svDUWWSSmY8KCzZJwYg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Douglas Arnold <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com>
To: "Laurent Montini (lmontini)" <lmontini@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1137a792c1dc5f0506201b08"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/DVnVdM7da7af5Ud-3i67xm0NV00
Cc: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Enterprise Profile
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:17:40 -0000

Hello Laurent,

Thank you for the feedback on the Enterprise Profile.  I have made the
following changes in the draft [see inline comments below].  An update will
be posted shortly.

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Laurent Montini (lmontini) <
lmontini@cisco.com> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
>  I have 3 comments:
>
>  1) Clause 8, first paragraph: is the sentence correct?
> “When Preferred Master Clocks are not the Best Master in one domain, they
> SHOULD operate in another domain when they. “
> Seems something missing.
>

   Text now reads:
   When Preferred Master Clocks are not the Best Master in one domain,
   they SHOULD operate as a master in another domain.

   Further explanation of multi-domain operation is added as well.

>
>  2) Unicast Discovery
> Clause 12: Forbidden options: “Slave clocks operating in the Enterprise
> Profile SHALL NOT use Unicast Discovery to establish connection to Master
> clocks.”
> Clause 13, 3rd paragraph:
> “Clocks operating in the Enterprise profile will not interoperate with
> clocks operating in the Telecom Profile for Frequency
> Synchronization[G8265.1], because the Enterprise Profile forbids Unicast
> Message Negotiation, and Unicast Discovery.”
> As neither Enterprise nor this Telecom profile use Unicast Discovery, how
> does it make this oiption an interoperability issue?
>

    Reference of Unicast Discovery has been removed from this passage.

>
>  3) Clause 13, paragraph before last, last sentence: “the Default Profile
> is…” : there are two default profiles in IEEE 1588-2008, in Annexes J.3 and
> J.4, one using the delay mechanism the other the pdelay mechanism.
>
>    - Obviously the Enterprise profile will not interop with J.4.
>    - Should the text be “The Default Profiles are described in Annexes
>    J.3 and J.4.”
>
>    This clause has been rewritten to discuss J.3 and J.4 cases separately.


> Regards,
> Laurent
>
>


-- 
Doug Arnold
Principal Technologist
*JTime!* Meinberg USA
+1-707-303-5559