Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08: (with COMMENT)
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 19 April 2016 18:41 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EC312E2E1; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sfqTytwfrh_N; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A302812E290; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:41:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87E9BE57; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:41:05 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4FgZFGVfYwx; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:41:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.87.49.100] (unknown [86.46.28.69]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D0BABE39; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:40:57 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1461091258; bh=oSnxzaVtFKN3kbPyRzOKObxGliJHJNOgQqOMI6M8pjM=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=omH8YuclU/s9lfw1ODJZXhQiw9UsrLzeMCD7kRcT50OPW0wod6STNj9H3To5r+O66 vqo7j8/Zr4REPKzrOdwn8e6QG+iyh7mFRqLhV5Y6EA9EkcGjUUX8dL8Ck+aIYiljZt 3owA1knYGs+TV6nAhgQ4Kl2zaMXa8te9UDWBZMF4=
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160419171216.31521.25135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <57167BB8.1080300@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:40:56 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160419171216.31521.25135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms030900020304030502070106"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/E8S-o_59mqJdVIIyIfIheKVzmFo>
Cc: tictoc-chairs@ietf.org, kodonog@pobox.com, tictoc@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tictoc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:41:14 -0000
Good catch wrt the EUI. I missed that. S. On 19/04/16 18:12, Alissa Cooper wrote: > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (1) The ClockIdentity is described as being generated based on an EUI-64 > address as described in IEEE 1588-2008 Section 7.5.2.2.2. But in IEEE > 1588-2008, there are two different ways the clock identifier can be > generated, the other being a non-EUI-64 address defined in 7.5.2.2.3. Why > is that option left out of the ClockIdentity description? > > In general I was dismayed to see the re-use of EUI-64 for clock identity > for the security and privacy drawbacks, since it's not particularly clear > that re-using those identifiers is necessary here. But if such a fix is > warranted this MIB is not the place to do it in any event. > > (2) Looking at > https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/mib-security I recall that > other MIB documents we've reviewed recently have listed out the specific > tables/objects that may be considered vulnerable or sensitive, even if > those objects are read-only. Why doesn't this document do that? I would > think all of the clock identity objects would belong in that bucket at a > minimum. > >
- [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ie… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draf… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draf… joel jaeggli
- Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draf… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draf… joel jaeggli
- Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draf… Rodney Cummings
- Re: [TICTOC] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draf… Tim Frost