[TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements

Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org> Mon, 25 February 2013 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <odonoghue@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAFB21F92A9 for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:41:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XdRtwNYGdYnq for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:41:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp155.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.155]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAAFD21F92C1 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 03:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp25.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E75202D0680; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:41:35 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp25.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: odonoghue-AT-isoc.org) with ESMTPSA id A70B82D038B; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:41:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <512B4DF0.8040907@isoc.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:41:36 -0500
From: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Organization: ISOC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [TICTOC] TICTOC WGLC of draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: odonoghue@isoc.org
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 11:41:44 -0000

This message initiates a two week TICTOC Working Group Last Call on 
advancing:

Title : Security Requirements of Time Synchronization Protocols in 
Packet Switched Networks
Author(s) : Tal Mizrahi
Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements-04.txt
Pages : 32
Date : 2013-02-07

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-security-requirements/

as an Informational RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support 
for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. 
Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last 
call will end on 12 March 2013.

I realize this WGLC comes right before the IETF; however, this document 
has been around for a long time, and it is my hope that this can be done 
expeditiously.

Regards,
Karen

Abstract: As time synchronization protocols are becoming increasingly 
common and widely deployed, concern about their exposure to various 
security threats is increasing. This document defines a set of security 
requirements for time synchronization protocols, focusing on the 
Precision Time Protocol (PTP) and the Network Time Protocol (NTP). This 
document also discusses the security impacts of time synchronization 
protocol practices, the time synchronization performance implications of 
external security practices, the dependencies between other security 
services and time synchronization.