[TICTOC] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05: (with COMMENT)

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 27 September 2016 22:37 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147501587874.11796.8771693819542248920.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 15:37:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/Fl5oE5eBM9w5gmRTq-c4IX1MoG4>
Cc: draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization@ietf.org, tictoc@ietf.org, odonoghue@isoc.org, tictoc-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [TICTOC] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I thought Stewart's "chicken and egg" response to Mirja's Discuss was
worth considering as an addition to the document that explains why the
document is making this assumption.

[TICTOC] Spencer Dawkins' No Objection on draft-i… Spencer Dawkins