[TICTOC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05: (with COMMENT)

"Stephen Farrell" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 28 September 2016 14:35 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147507334110.16640.14765391886925389922.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2016 07:35:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tictoc/J4KI_BB2t3J_ttDHK5Sxhr_37pM>
Cc: draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization@ietf.org, tictoc@ietf.org, odonoghue@isoc.org, tictoc-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [TICTOC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Does this increase the DDoS amplification potential of NTP
(and/or PTP)? Seems like it must, to at least some extent.
I'd suggest noting that and warning, in particular dual-ended
masters, to consider that.

[TICTOC] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-… Stephen Farrell